A client on other items ended up going with a Toshiba CTX. Having sat in on the process, I'm disappointed in the industry..here's why.
This is multi-tenant. I recommended avoiding SMDR for billing resolution, if possible, to avoid squabbles. But the PRI carrier can not bill on outgoing CNID. That's OK; the CTX can't do what we wanted & provide one CNID/tenant anyhow! [We're choosing to punt with a generic outgoing that will appear on the recpt. console & be answered "law office"..] The PRI vendor can do billing by non-verified account codes but not on local calls. But the CTX can't automagically generate codes per extension. Argh. Hence, they're going with SMDR. The plus of the PRI is it's <half the recurring charges vice Ma's ground starts for each tenant. Plus with volume, inter/intra state is less than 4c/min. Plus Plus, this carrier is charging 60% of Ma on the /call local cost. (OBT|Ameritech|SBC does not even offer /call on PRI without pulling teeth to get same -- they want /min billing on everything. I expect a quarter slot on the next White Pages.) -- A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED] & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 _________________________________________________________________ KX-T Mailing list --- http://kxthelp.com/ Subscription changes: http://kxthelp.com/mailman/listinfo/kxt
