Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-04-09:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:17:46PM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
>> From: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zh...@intel.com>
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zh...@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c |    9 +++++++ arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h |    2 +
>>  virt/kvm/ioapic.c    |   60
>>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ virt/kvm/ioapic.h  
>>   |    1 + 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> index 0b73402..6796218 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> @@ -94,6 +94,14 @@ static inline int apic_test_vector(int vec, void *bitmap)
>>      return test_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec));
>>  }
>> +bool kvm_apic_pending_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector)
>> +{
>> +    struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
>> +
>> +    return apic_test_vector(vector, apic->regs + APIC_ISR) ||
>> +            apic_test_vector(vector, apic->regs + APIC_IRR);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static inline void apic_set_vector(int vec, void *bitmap)
>>  {
>>      set_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec));
>> @@ -1618,6 +1626,7 @@ void kvm_apic_post_state_restore(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu,
>>      apic->highest_isr_cache = -1;
>>      kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_isr_update(vcpu->kvm,
>>  apic_find_highest_isr(apic));       kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
>>  +   kvm_rtc_eoi_tracking_restore_one(vcpu); }
>>  
>>  void __kvm_migrate_apic_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
>> index 3e5a431..16304b1 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
>> @@ -166,4 +166,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_apic_has_events(struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>      return vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events;
>>  }
>> +bool kvm_apic_pending_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector);
>> +
>>  #endif
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
>> index 27ae8dd..4699180 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
>> @@ -90,6 +90,64 @@ static unsigned long ioapic_read_indirect(struct
> kvm_ioapic *ioapic,
>>      return result;
>>  }
>> +static void rtc_irq_reset(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
> rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_reset()
Sure. 

> 
>> +{
>> +    ioapic->rtc_status.pending_eoi = 0;
>> +    bitmap_zero(ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map, KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_restore_one(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +                                            int vector)
>> +{
>> +    bool new_val, old_val;
>> +    struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = vcpu->kvm->arch.vioapic;
>> +    union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *e;
>> +
>> +    e = &ioapic->redirtbl[RTC_GSI];
>> +    if (!kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, NULL, 0, e->fields.dest_id,
>> +                            e->fields.dest_mode))
>> +            return;
>> +
>> +    new_val = kvm_apic_pending_eoi(vcpu, vector);
>> +    old_val = test_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map);
>> +
>> +    if (new_val == old_val)
>> +            return;
>> +
>> +    if (new_val) {
>> +            __set_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map);
>> +            ioapic->rtc_status.pending_eoi++;
>> +    } else {
>> +            __clear_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map);
>> +            ioapic->rtc_status.pending_eoi--;
>> +    }
> WARN_ON(ioapic->rtc_status.pending_eoi < 0);
Sure.

> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +void kvm_rtc_eoi_tracking_restore_one(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +    struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = vcpu->kvm->arch.vioapic;
>> +    int vector;
>> +
>> +    vector = ioapic->redirtbl[RTC_GSI].fields.vector;
> Do not access ioapic outside of the lock. Also since you access
> ioapic->redirtbl[RTC_GSI] in __rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_restore_one()
> anyway what's the point passing vector to it?
Right. 

> 
>> +    spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
>> +    __rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_restore_one(vcpu, vector);
>> +    spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kvm_rtc_eoi_tracking_restore_all(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
>> +{
>> +    struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> +    int i, vector;
>> +
>> +    if (RTC_GSI >= IOAPIC_NUM_PINS)
>> +            return;
>> +
>> +    rtc_irq_reset(ioapic);
>> +    vector = ioapic->redirtbl[RTC_GSI].fields.vector;
>> +    kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, ioapic->kvm)
>> +        __rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_restore_one(vcpu, vector);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int ioapic_service(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, unsigned int idx)
>>  {   union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *pent; @@ -428,6 +486,7 @@ void
>>  kvm_ioapic_reset(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)         ioapic->ioregsel = 0;
>>      ioapic->irr = 0;        ioapic->id = 0; +       rtc_irq_reset(ioapic);
>>      update_handled_vectors(ioapic); }
>> @@ -494,6 +553,7 @@ int kvm_set_ioapic(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> kvm_ioapic_state *state)
>>      memcpy(ioapic, state, sizeof(struct kvm_ioapic_state));
>>      update_handled_vectors(ioapic);
>>      kvm_ioapic_make_eoibitmap_request(kvm);
>>  +   kvm_rtc_eoi_tracking_restore_all(ioapic);
>>      spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);     return 0; }
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
>> index 761e5b5..313fc4e 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
>> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static inline struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic_irqchip(struct kvm
> *kvm)
>>      return kvm->arch.vioapic;
>>  }
>> +void kvm_rtc_eoi_tracking_restore_one(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>  int kvm_apic_match_dest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_lapic *source,
>>              int short_hand, int dest, int dest_mode);
>>  int kvm_apic_compare_prio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu1, struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu2);
>> --
>> 1.7.1
> 
> --
>                       Gleb.


Best regards,
Yang

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to