On 20/03/13 20:04, Christopher Covington wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 03/13/2013 03:59 PM, Christopher Covington wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Alternatively, you could consider storing the host registers in a
>> slimmed-down vcpu structure for hosts, rather than on the stack.
I am actively implementing this (I'm turning the vfp_host pointer into a
full blown CPU context). It looks promising so far, stay tuned.
> One potential argument for storing the host in the same sort of vcpu structure
> as the guest rather than on the hypervisor stack is that snapshot and
> migration support initially intended for guests might more easily be extended
> to work for hosts as well.
Not sure I'm following you here. Are you thinking of snapshoting both
host and guests, and migrating the whole thing? Ambitious... ;-)
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
