On 26.11.2012, at 22:55, Alexander Graf wrote:

> 
> On 26.11.2012, at 22:33, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 23.11.2012, at 22:42, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 22.11.2012, at 10:25, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +        /* Do they have an SLB shadow buffer registered? */
>>>>>> +        slb = vcpu->arch.slb_shadow.pinned_addr;
>>>>>> +        if (!slb)
>>>>>> +                return;
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mind to explain this case? What happens here? Do we leave the guest with 
>>>>> an empty SLB? Why would this ever happen? What happens next as soon as we 
>>>>> go back into the guest?
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, we leave the guest with an empty SLB, the access gets retried and
>>>> this time the guest gets an SLB miss interrupt, which it can hopefully
>>>> handle using an SLB miss handler that runs entirely in real mode.
>>>> This could happen for instance while the guest is in SLOF or yaboot or
>>>> some other code that runs basically in real mode but occasionally
>>>> turns the MMU on for some accesses, and happens to have a bug where it
>>>> creates a duplicate SLB entry.
>>> 
>>> Is this what pHyp does? Also, is this what we want? Why don't we populate 
>>> an #MC into the guest so it knows it did something wrong?
>> 
>> Yes, yes and we do.  Anytime we get a machine check while in the guest
>> we give the guest a machine check interrupt.
>> 
>> Ultimately we want to implement the "FWNMI" (Firmware-assisted NMI)
>> thing defined in PAPR which makes the handling of system reset and
>> machine check slightly nicer for the guest, but that's for later.  It
>> will build on top of the stuff in this patch.
> 
> So why would the function return 1 then which means "MC is handled, forget 
> about it" rather than 0, which means "inject MC into the guest"?

Oh wait - 1 means "have the host handle it". Let me check up the code again.


Alex--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to