On 22 October 2012 08:51, Christoffer Dall <[email protected]> wrote: > +struct kvm_device_address { > + __u32 id; > + __u64 addr; > +};
Ben suggested that this should either be a 64 bit id or have explicit padding. Other than that I think that our current proposed ABI for ARM irqchips is in line with the discussion we just had at KVM Forum for handling non-x86 in-kernel irqchips [hopefully somebody will write the details of that up...] Ben, do I have that right? thanks -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
