On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:25 -0800, John Fastabend wrote: > Well I think NETLINK_ROUTE is the most correct type to use in this > case. Per netlink.h its for routing and device hooks. > > #define NETLINK_ROUTE 0 /* Routing/device hook > */ > > And NETLINK_ROUTE msg_types use the RTM_* prefix. The _*NEIGH postfix > were merely a copy from the SW BRIDGE code paths. How about, > > PF_BRIDGE:RTM_FDB_NEWENTRY > PF_BRIDGE:RTM_FDB_DELENTRY > PF_BRIDGE:RTM_FDB_GETENTRY
OK, I guess ;-> > And a new group RTNLGRP_FDB. Nod. > Also using NETLINK_ROUTE gives the correct > rtnl locking semantics for free. makes sense. > Agreed. I think adding some ndo_ops for bridging offloads here would > work. For example the DSA infrastructure and/or macvlan devices might > need this. Along the lines of extending this RFC, > > [RFC] hardware bridging support for DSA switches > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/16578/ Certainly - thats one approach that is reasonable. Where is Lennert? ;-> I changed his email address to one that i am familiar with. cheers, jamal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
