Hi,
Sorry for the late reply.
On (Thu) 12 Jan 2012 [09:20:07], zanghongy...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Hongyong Zang <zanghongy...@huawei.com>
>
> Add setup_port_vq(). Create the io ports' vqs when add_port.
Can you describe the changes in more detail, please?
> Signed-off-by: Hongyong Zang <zanghongy...@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> index 8e3c46d..2e5187e 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> @@ -1132,6 +1132,55 @@ static void send_sigio_to_port(struct port *port)
> kill_fasync(&port->async_queue, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
> }
>
> +static void in_intr(struct virtqueue *vq);
> +static void out_intr(struct virtqueue *vq);
> +
> +static int setup_port_vq(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id)
> +{
> + int err, vq_num;
> + vq_callback_t **io_callbacks;
> + char **io_names;
> + struct virtqueue **vqs;
> + u32 i,j,nr_ports,nr_queues;
> +
> + err = 0;
> + vq_num = (id + 1) * 2;
> + nr_ports = portdev->config.max_nr_ports;
> + nr_queues = use_multiport(portdev) ? (nr_ports + 1) * 2 : 2;
> +
> + vqs = kmalloc(nr_queues * sizeof(struct virtqueue *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + io_callbacks = kmalloc(nr_queues * sizeof(vq_callback_t *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + io_names = kmalloc(nr_queues * sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vqs || !io_callbacks || !io_names) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0, j = 0; i <= nr_ports; i++) {
> + io_callbacks[j] = in_intr;
> + io_callbacks[j + 1] = out_intr;
> + io_names[j] = NULL;
> + io_names[j + 1] = NULL;
> + j += 2;
> + }
> + io_names[vq_num] = "serial-input";
> + io_names[vq_num + 1] = "serial-output";
> + err = portdev->vdev->config->find_vqs(portdev->vdev, nr_queues, vqs,
> + io_callbacks,
> + (const char **)io_names);
> + if (err)
> + goto free;
> + portdev->in_vqs[id] = vqs[vq_num];
> + portdev->out_vqs[id] = vqs[vq_num + 1];
I don't think this approach will work fine for port hot-plug /
hot-unplug cases at all. For example, I first start qemu with one
port, at id 1. Then I add a port at id 5, then at 2, then at 10.
Will that be fine?
> +
> +free:
> + kfree(io_names);
> + kfree(io_callbacks);
> + kfree(vqs);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id)
> {
> char debugfs_name[16];
> @@ -1163,6 +1212,14 @@ static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32
> id)
>
> port->outvq_full = false;
>
> + if (!portdev->in_vqs[port->id] && !portdev->out_vqs[port->id]) {
> + spin_lock(&portdev->ports_lock);
> + err = setup_port_vq(portdev, port->id);
> + spin_unlock(&portdev->ports_lock);
> + if (err)
> + goto free_port;
> + }
> +
> port->in_vq = portdev->in_vqs[port->id];
> port->out_vq = portdev->out_vqs[port->id];
>
> @@ -1614,8 +1671,8 @@ static int init_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev)
> j += 2;
> io_callbacks[j] = in_intr;
> io_callbacks[j + 1] = out_intr;
> - io_names[j] = "input";
> - io_names[j + 1] = "output";
> + io_names[j] = NULL;
> + io_names[j + 1] = NULL;
> }
> }
> /* Find the queues. */
> @@ -1635,8 +1692,8 @@ static int init_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev)
>
> for (i = 1; i < nr_ports; i++) {
> j += 2;
> - portdev->in_vqs[i] = vqs[j];
> - portdev->out_vqs[i] = vqs[j + 1];
> + portdev->in_vqs[i] = NULL;
> + portdev->out_vqs[i] = NULL;
> }
> }
> kfree(io_names);
So a queue once created will not be removed unless the module is
removed or the device is removed. That seems reasonable, port
hot-unplug will keep queues around, as is the case now.
Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
