On 25.07.2011, at 12:16, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >>> So it was a no brainer for me to pull it into -tip. >> >> The thing I don't agree with is that it should live in the kernel >> tree. > > FYI, tools/kvm/ *already* lives in the kernel tree - that is how it's > developed and used and it also shares code with the kernel.
So you're just trying to make this a self-fulfilling prophecy now? I already stated before that I could easily add those 'requirements' to any project I liked. That still wouldn't mean it's a good idea to clutter the _kernel_ repository with its code. It's not a kernel. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
