On 07/12/2011 02:23 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>
> I don't insist on a new type of exit, just pointing out the problem.
I agree with you, I don't have a better solution either.
I don't feel it's worth it adding so much code for read support to
properly work. Can we do this patch series without socket read support
at the moment?
No. As I said before, I don't want a fragmented ABI.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
