Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 17:24 +0100, Patrick McHardy a écrit : > Am 14.02.2011 16:50, schrieb Eric Dumazet: > > Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 16:18 +0100, Jan Engelhardt a écrit : > >> On Monday 2011-02-14 16:11, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> > >>> Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 16:58 +0200, Avi Kivity a écrit : > >>>> We see severe memory corruption in kvm while used in conjunction with > >>>> bridge/netfilter. Enabling slab debugging points the finger at a > >>>> netfilter chain invoked from the bridge code. > >>>> > >>>> Can someone take a look? > >>>> > >>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27052 > >> > >> Maybe looks familiar to https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/3/147 > > > > Are you sure Jan ? > > > > IMHO it looks like in your case, a NULL ->hook() is called, from > > nf_iterate() > > > > BTW, list_for_each_continue_rcu() really should be converted to > > list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() > > > > This is a bit ugly : > > > > list_for_each_continue_rcu(*i, head) { > > struct nf_hook_ops *elem = (struct nf_hook_ops *)*i; > > > > Also, I wonder if RCU rules are respected in nf_iterate(). > > For example this line is really suspicious : > > > > *i = (*i)->prev; > > Yeah, that definitely looks wrong. How about this instead? >
This patch seems fine to me, thanks ! Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
