Well, mine are pretty much the same as of those who already replied. to emphasize the most important for me: - xen developers didn't seem that much interested to push everything into mainline, in general kvm developmen process seem much open to me.., - it was problematic for me to use some of new features we needed for such old kernels XEN's been based on - after the xen has been bought by citrix, future course was unclear - redhat which we've based our distro upon switched to KVM as well (and bought qumranet) - since KVM runs VMs as normal processes, there are better possibilities to use various types of "shaping" using cgroups etc. - KVM seems to be simpler to debug to me and community is pretty friendly here
well, thats enough I guess :) all I have to say is that I too am pretty gratefull to KVM and also QEMU developers. thanks guys! nik On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:20:17PM +0000, Mauro wrote: > On 10 February 2011 19:30, Nikola Ciprich <extmaill...@linuxbox.cz> wrote: > > Hi, > > I switched from XEN to KVM long time ago, and haven't felt sorry since > > then... > > Are You interestid in something in particular? > > Then.....I'm interested on your motivations to switch from xen to kvm. > If it's important I use debian squeeze. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- ------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: ser...@linuxbox.cz ------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
