On 01/20/2011 11:27 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >> Sure :-), there is the simply test result of kernbench: >> >> Before patch: >> >> real 5m6.493s >> >> user 3m57.847s >> >> sys 9m7.115s >> >> real 5m1.750s >> >> user 4m0.109s >> >> sys 9m10.192s >> >> >> After patch: >> real 5m0.140s >> >> user 3m57.956s >> >> sys 8m58.339s >> >> real 4m56.314s >> >> user 4m0.303s >> >> sys 8m55.774s > > Nice. One disadvantageous side effect for the kvm_vcpu_kick path > is that it can race with make_all_cpus_request, which is possibly > doing unrelated, slower work (IPI'ing other vcpus, waiting for > response). > > Looks ok, but lets wait for more careful reviews before applying. >
Hi Avi, Marcelo, I shall on vacation from 1.25 to 2.9, if you have comments on it i'll replay after coming back. :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
