On 06/02/2010 03:19 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Yes. so you do:
iommu = open
ioctl(dev1, BIND, iommu)
ioctl(dev2, BIND, iommu)
ioctl(dev3, BIND, iommu)
ioctl(dev4, BIND, iommu)
No need to add a SHARE ioctl.
In my proposal this looks like:
dev1 = open();
ioctl(dev2, SHARE, dev1);
ioctl(dev3, SHARE, dev1);
ioctl(dev4, SHARE, dev1);
So we actually save an ioctl.
The problem with this is that it is assymetric, dev1 is treated
differently from dev[234]. It's an unintuitive API.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
