Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:11:17AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
>>
>> This overflow should have left the check broken behind for 32-bit hosts.
> 
> The check itself should work but it gives a compile warning for me (at
> least in my small userspace test I did ;) Good catch, thanks.

To my understanding, the test degraded to value != 0x00010015. That may
not have the intended effect, no?

Jan

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
> 
> Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
> 
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> index 3c03c36..fd32791 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> @@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ static bool is_erratum_383(void)
>>      /* Bit 62 may or may not be set for this mce */
>>      value &= ~(1ULL << 62);
>>  
>> -    if (value != 0xb600000000010015)
>> +    if (value != 0xb600000000010015ULL)
>>              return false;
>>  
>>      /* Clear MCi_STATUS registers */
>> -- 
>> 1.6.0.2
>>
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to