On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 08:59 +0530, sudhir kumar wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Yolkfull Chow <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Looks good for me. Thanks Lucas for improving this test.
>> >
>> > Sudhir, what do you think about this? :)
>> Needs couple of hours before I go through the patch. I will post my
>> comments by today. Also would like to give a quick run for windows
>> guests which are more prone to break :) Thanks Lucas for the effort.
>
> Thanks guys,
>
> I've found some bugs on the version I sent to the mailing list, the bugs
> were fixed and now the test looks like this - please review this
> version!
>
> import re, string, logging
> from autotest_lib.client.common_lib import error
> import kvm_test_utils, kvm_utils
>
>
> def run_physical_resources_check(test, params, env):
> """
> Check physical resources assigned to KVM virtual machines:
> 1) Log into the guest
> 2) Verify whether cpu counts ,memory size, nics' model,
> count and drives' format & count, drive_serial, UUID
> reported by the guest OS matches what has been assigned
> to the VM (qemu command line)
> 3) Verify all MAC addresses for guest NICs
>
> �...@param test: kvm test object
> �...@param params: Dictionary with the test parameters
> �...@param env: Dictionary with test environment.
> """
> vm = kvm_test_utils.get_living_vm(env, params.get("main_vm"))
> session = kvm_test_utils.wait_for_login(vm)
>
> logging.info("Starting physical resources check test")
> logging.info("Values assigned to VM are the values we expect "
> "to see reported by the Operating System")
> # Define a failure counter, as we want to check all physical
> # resources to know which checks passed and which ones failed
> n_fail = 0
>
> # Check cpu count
> logging.info("CPU count check")
> expected_cpu_nr = int(params.get("smp"))
> actual_cpu_nr = vm.get_cpu_count()
> if expected_cpu_nr != actual_cpu_nr:
> n_fail += 1
> logging.error("CPU count mismatch:")
> logging.error(" Assigned to VM: %s" % expected_cpu_nr)
> logging.error(" Reported by OS: %s" % actual_cpu_nr)
>
> # Check memory size
> logging.info("Memory size check")
> expected_mem = int(params.get("mem"))
> actual_mem = vm.get_memory_size()
> if actual_mem != expected_mem:
> n_fail += 1
> logging.error("Memory size mismatch:")
> logging.error(" Assigned to VM: %s" % expected_mem)
> logging.error(" Reported by OS: %s" % actual_mem)
>
> # Define a function for checking number of hard drivers & NICs
> def check_num(devices, cmd, check_str):
> f_fail = 0
> expected_num = kvm_utils.get_sub_dict_names(params, devices).__len__()
> s, o = vm.send_monitor_cmd(cmd)
> if s != 0:
> f_fail += 1
> logging.error("qemu monitor command failed: %s" % cmd)
>
> actual_num = string.count(o, check_str)
> if expected_num != actual_num:
> f_fail += 1
> logging.error("%s number mismatch:")
> logging.error(" Assigned to VM: %d" % expected_num)
> logging.error(" Reported by OS: %d" % actual_num)
> return expected_num, f_fail
>
> logging.info("Hard drive count check")
> drives_num, f_fail = check_num("images", "info block", "type=hd")
> n_fail += f_fail
>
> logging.info("NIC count check")
> nics_num, f_fail = check_num("nics", "info network", "model=")
> n_fail += f_fail
>
> # Define a function for checking hard drives & NICs' model
> def chk_fmt_model(device, fmt_model, cmd, str):
> f_fail = 0
> devices = kvm_utils.get_sub_dict_names(params, device)
> for chk_device in devices:
> expected = kvm_utils.get_sub_dict(params,
> chk_device).get(fmt_model)
> if not expected:
> expected = "rtl8139"
chk_fmt_model is a generic function. why are we initializing this
variable, expected to rtl8139 ?
> s, o = vm.send_monitor_cmd(cmd)
> if s != 0:
> f_fail += 1
> logging.error("qemu monitor command failed: %s" % cmd)
>
> device_found = re.findall(str, o)
> logging.debug("Found devices: %s" % device_found)
> found = False
> for fm in device_found:
> if expected in fm:
> found = True
>
> if not found:
> f_fail += 1
> logging.error("%s model mismatch:")
> logging.error(" Assigned to VM: %s" % expected)
> logging.error(" Reported by OS: %s" % device_found)
> return f_fail
>
> logging.info("NICs model check")
> f_fail = chk_fmt_model("nics", "nic_model", "info network", "model=(.*),")
> n_fail += f_fail
>
> logging.info("Drive format check")
> f_fail = chk_fmt_model("images", "drive_format", "info block",
> "(.*)\: type=hd")
> n_fail += f_fail
>
> logging.info("Network card MAC check")
> s, o = vm.send_monitor_cmd("info network")
> if s != 0:
> n_fail += 1
> logging.error("qemu monitor command failed: info network")
> found_mac_addresses = re.findall("macaddr=(.*)", o)
> logging.debug("Found MAC adresses: %s" % found_mac_addresses)
>
> for nic_name in kvm_utils.get_sub_dict_names(params, "nics"):
> nic_params = kvm_utils.get_sub_dict(params, nic_name)
> mac, ip = kvm_utils.get_mac_ip_pair_from_dict(nic_params)
> if not string.lower(mac) in found_mac_addresses:
> n_fail += 1
> logging.error("MAC address mismatch:")
> logging.error(" Assigned to VM (not found): %s" % mac)
>
> # Define a function to verify UUID & Serial number
> def verify_device(expect, name, verify_cmd):
> f_fail = 0
> if verify_cmd:
> actual = session.get_command_output(verify_cmd)
> if not string.upper(expect) in actual:
> f_fail += 1
> logging.error("%s mismatch:")
> logging.error(" Assigned to VM: %s" % string.upper(expect))
> logging.error(" Reported by OS: %s" % actual)
> return f_fail
>
> logging.info("UUID check")
> if vm.get_uuid():
> f_fail = verify_device(vm.get_uuid(), "UUID",
> params.get("catch_uuid_cmd"))
> n_fail += f_fail
>
> logging.info("Hard Disk serial number check")
> catch_serial_cmd = params.get("catch_serial_cmd")
> f_fail = verify_device(params.get("drive_serial"), "Serial",
> catch_serial_cmd)
> n_fail += f_fail
>
> if n_fail != 0:
> raise error.TestFail("Physical resources check test reported %s "
> "failures. Please verify the test logs." % n_fail)
>
> session.close()
A generic question: In the patch we are verifying some of the
resources(image, nic) through qemu monitor. Is it sufficient instead
of testing them inside OS(as we do for cpu and memory)? However a
particular device may not have been configured inside guest OS but
still it will be visible to the guest OS.
>
>
>
--
Sudhir Kumar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
