Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Gregory Haskins wrote: > > >> To be honest, I am not sure. I would guess its not a *huge* deal, >> though it was obviously enough of a concern to at least discuss it. I >> can definitely say that I think the other issues which are being fixed >> are substantially more important. >> > > Ok then, will repost the revised patch later today. >
Ok sounds good. I did have a chance to take a closer look at your proposal for the key data, and I think it makes a lot of sense. Do you see it as a problem if we defer adding that? Or should we try to add that notion now? -Greg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
