On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:14:21PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/15/2009 01:11 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:03:39PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/14/2009 01:52 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Instead of having special case in vcpu event loop.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'm a little worried about two vcpus INITing each other simultaneously
>>> and deadlocking. INIT/SIPI are async events, the initiator should not
>>> wait for them.
>>>
>>>
>> I thought to add on_vcpu_async() for that (if this case is worth warring
>> about).
>>
>
> A generic on_vcpu_async() would need to allocate, that might be expoitable.
>
Then what about processing events while waiting in on_vcpu()?
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
