On Monday 25 May 2009 17:07:33 Avi Kivity wrote: > Sheng Yang wrote: > > OK, you are totally talking about PV. For PV, I think let host kernel > > accept the modification is more important here. (And for PV, using > > hypercall seems more directly). > > Microsoft already defined their interfaces, and they use MSRs (but a > different range from x2apic).
I think that means the PV interface for lapic. And yes, we can support it follow MS's interface, but x2apic still seems another story as you noted... I still don't think support x2apic here would bring us more benefits. -- regards Yang, Sheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
