On 30/10/2015 15:48, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> BSP doesn't get INIT so its apic_arb_prio isn't zeroed after reboot.
> BSP won't get lowest priority interrupts until other VCPUs get enough
> interrupts to match their pre-reboot apic_arb_prio.
> 
> That behavior doesn't fit into KVM's round-robin-like interpretation of
> lowest priority delivery ... userspace should KVM_SET_LAPIC on reset, so
> just zero apic_arb_prio there.
> 
> Reported-by: Yuki Shibuya <shibuya...@ncos.nec.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 1b02c44c7b8b..08655020417d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1924,6 +1924,8 @@ void kvm_apic_post_state_restore(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>       kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
>       if (ioapic_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))
>               kvm_rtc_eoi_tracking_restore_one(vcpu);
> +
> +     vcpu->arch.apic_arb_prio = 0;
>  }
>  
>  void __kvm_migrate_apic_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> 

Applied, thanks.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to