On 27/10/2015 22:26, Yunhong Jiang wrote:
>> > On RT kernels however can you call eventfd_signal from interrupt
>> > context?  You cannot call spin_lock_irqsave (which can sleep) from a
>> > non-threaded interrupt handler, can you?  You would need a raw spin lock.
> Thanks for pointing this out. Yes, we can't call spin_lock_irqsave on RT 
> kernel. Will do this way on next patch. But not sure if it's overkill to use 
> raw_spinlock there since the eventfd_signal is used by other caller also.

No, I don't think you can use raw_spinlock there.  The problem is not
just eventfd_signal, it is especially wake_up_locked_poll.  You cannot
convert the whole workqueue infrastructure to use raw_spinlock.

Alex, would it make sense to use the IRQ bypass infrastructure always,
not just for VT-d, to do the MSI injection directly from the VFIO
interrupt handler and bypass the eventfd?  Basically this would add an
RCU-protected list of consumers matching the token to struct
irq_bypass_producer, and a

        int (*inject)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *);

callback to struct irq_bypass_consumer.  If any callback returns true,
the eventfd is not signaled.  The KVM implementation would be like this
(compare with virt/kvm/eventfd.c):

        /* Extracted out of irqfd_wakeup */
        static int
        irqfd_wakeup_pollin(struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd)
        {
                ...
        }

        /* Extracted out of irqfd_wakeup */
        static int
        irqfd_wakeup_pollhup(struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd)
        {
                ...
        }

        static int
        irqfd_wakeup(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
                     void *key)
        {
                struct _irqfd *irqfd = container_of(wait,
                        struct _irqfd, wait);
                unsigned long flags = (unsigned long)key;

                if (flags & POLLIN)
                        irqfd_wakeup_pollin(irqfd);
                if (flags & POLLHUP)
                        irqfd_wakeup_pollhup(irqfd);

                return 0;
        }

        static int kvm_arch_irq_bypass_inject(
                struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
        {
                struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
                        container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd,
                                     consumer); 

                irqfd_wakeup_pollin(irqfd);
        }

Or do you think it would be a hack?  The latency improvement might
actually be even better than what Yunhong is already reporting.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to