Hello! > It is really up to whoever adds support for LPIs to make sure it's done > correctly. So I think this is for Andre to work out in his ITS series. > > This patch fixes an issue with the current code in the correct way as > far as I can tell.
Ok. An alternate way is to introduce a function which would check for any pending LPIs. I will suggest a fix on top of the current series after some time. I'm cc'ing this whole discussion to Andre. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
