On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:34:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > numa_mem_id() is able to handle allocation from CPUs on memory-less nodes, > so it's a more robust fallback than the currently used numa_node_id().
Won't it fall through to the next closest memory node in the zonelist anyway? Is this for callers doing NUMA_NO_NODE with __GFP_THISZONE? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
