On June 30, 2015 5:16:41 AM GMT+08:00, Christoffer Dall
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 06:41:29PM +0800, Zhichao Huang wrote:
>> Add handlers for all the 32-bit debug registers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhichao Huang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 12 ++++
>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +
>> arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
>> arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c | 122
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
>b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
>> index 25410b2..ba65e05 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
>> @@ -52,6 +52,18 @@
>> #define c10_AMAIR1 30 /* Auxilary Memory Attribute Indirection Reg1
>*/
>> #define NR_CP15_REGS 31 /* Number of regs (incl. invalid) */
>>
>> +/* 0 is reserved as an invalid value. */
>> +#define cp14_DBGBVR0 1 /* Debug Breakpoint Control Registers
>> (0-15)
>*/
>> +#define cp14_DBGBVR15 16
>> +#define cp14_DBGBCR0 17 /* Debug Breakpoint Value Registers
>> (0-15)
>*/
>> +#define cp14_DBGBCR15 32
>> +#define cp14_DBGWVR0 33 /* Debug Watchpoint Control Registers
>> (0-15)
>*/
>> +#define cp14_DBGWVR15 48
>> +#define cp14_DBGWCR0 49 /* Debug Watchpoint Value Registers
>> (0-15)
>*/
>> +#define cp14_DBGWCR15 64
>> +#define cp14_DBGDSCRext 65 /* Debug Status and Control external */
>> +#define NR_CP14_REGS 66 /* Number of regs (incl. invalid) */
>> +
>> #define ARM_EXCEPTION_RESET 0
>> #define ARM_EXCEPTION_UNDEFINED 1
>> #define ARM_EXCEPTION_SOFTWARE 2
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index d71607c..3d16820 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>> struct vgic_cpu vgic_cpu;
>> struct arch_timer_cpu timer_cpu;
>>
>> + /* System control coprocessor (cp14) */
>> + u32 cp14[NR_CP14_REGS];
>> +
>> /*
>> * Anything that is not used directly from assembly code goes
>> * here.
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c
>b/arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c
>> index 871b826..9158de0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c
>> @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ int main(void)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST
>> DEFINE(VCPU_KVM, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, kvm));
>> DEFINE(VCPU_MIDR, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.midr));
>> + DEFINE(VCPU_CP14, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.cp14));
>> DEFINE(VCPU_CP15, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.cp15));
>> DEFINE(VCPU_VFP_GUEST, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.vfp_guest));
>> DEFINE(VCPU_VFP_HOST, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu,
>arch.host_cpu_context));
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
>> index 16d5f69..59b65b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
>> @@ -220,6 +220,47 @@ bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool trap_debug32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + const struct coproc_params *p,
>> + const struct coproc_reg *r)
>> +{
>> + if (p->is_write)
>> + vcpu->arch.cp14[r->reg] = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt1);
>> + else
>> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt1) = vcpu->arch.cp14[r->reg];
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* DBGIDR (RO) Debug ID */
>> +static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + const struct coproc_params *p,
>> + const struct coproc_reg *r)
>> +{
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + if (p->is_write)
>> + return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
>> +
>> + ARM_DBG_READ(c0, c0, 0, val);
>> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt1) = val;
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* DBGDSCRint (RO) Debug Status and Control Register */
>> +static bool trap_dbgdscr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + const struct coproc_params *p,
>> + const struct coproc_reg *r)
>> +{
>> + if (p->is_write)
>> + return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
>> +
>> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt1) = vcpu->arch.cp14[r->reg];
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * We could trap ID_DFR0 and tell the guest we don't support
>performance
>> * monitoring. Unfortunately the patch to make the kernel check
>ID_DFR0 was
>> @@ -375,7 +416,88 @@ static const struct coproc_reg cp15_regs[] = {
>> { CRn(15), CRm( 0), Op1( 4), Op2( 0), is32, access_cbar},
>> };
>>
>> +#define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(n) \
>> + /* DBGBVRn */ \
>> + { CRn( 0), CRm((n)), Op1( 0), Op2( 4), is32, \
>> + trap_debug32, reset_val, (cp14_DBGBVR0 + (n)), 0 }, \
>> + /* DBGBCRn */ \
>> + { CRn( 0), CRm((n)), Op1( 0), Op2( 5), is32, \
>> + trap_debug32, reset_val, (cp14_DBGBCR0 + (n)), 0 }, \
>> + /* DBGWVRn */ \
>> + { CRn( 0), CRm((n)), Op1( 0), Op2( 6), is32, \
>> + trap_debug32, reset_val, (cp14_DBGWVR0 + (n)), 0 }, \
>> + /* DBGWCRn */ \
>> + { CRn( 0), CRm((n)), Op1( 0), Op2( 7), is32, \
>> + trap_debug32, reset_val, (cp14_DBGWCR0 + (n)), 0 }
>> +
>> +/* No OS DBGBXVR machanism implemented. */
>> +#define DBGBXVR(n) \
>> + { CRn( 1), CRm((n)), Op1( 0), Op2( 1), is32, trap_raz_wi }
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Trapped cp14 registers. We generally ignore most of the external
>> + * debug, on the principle that they don't really make sense to a
>> + * guest. Revisit this one day, whould this principle change.
>
>s/whould/should/
>
ok.
>> + */
>> static const struct coproc_reg cp14_regs[] = {
>> + /* DBGIDR */
>> + { CRn( 0), CRm( 0), Op1( 0), Op2( 0), is32, trap_dbgidr},
>> + /* DBGDTRRXext */
>> + { CRn( 0), CRm( 0), Op1( 0), Op2( 2), is32, trap_raz_wi },
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(0),
>> + /* DBGDSCRint */
>> + { CRn( 0), CRm( 1), Op1( 0), Op2( 0), is32, trap_dbgdscr,
>> + NULL, cp14_DBGDSCRext },
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(1),
>> + /* DBGDSCRext */
>> + { CRn( 0), CRm( 2), Op1( 0), Op2( 2), is32, trap_debug32,
>> + reset_val, cp14_DBGDSCRext, 0 },
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(2),
>> + /* DBGDTRRXext */
>> + { CRn( 0), CRm( 3), Op1( 0), Op2( 2), is32, trap_raz_wi },
>
>isn't this the DBGDTRTXext register?
Thanks for pointing out.
>
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(3),
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(4),
>> + /* DBGDTR[RT]Xint */
>> + { CRn( 0), CRm( 5), Op1( 0), Op2( 0), is32, trap_raz_wi },
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(5),
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(6),
>> + /* DBGVCR */
>> + { CRn( 0), CRm( 7), Op1( 0), Op2( 0), is32, trap_debug32 },
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(7),
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(8),
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(9),
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(10),
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(11),
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(12),
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(13),
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(14),
>> + DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(15),
>> +
>> + DBGBXVR(0),
>> + /* DBGOSLAR */
>> + { CRn( 1), CRm( 0), Op1( 0), Op2( 4), is32, trap_raz_wi },
>> + DBGBXVR(1),
>> + /* DBGOSLSR */
>> + { CRn( 1), CRm( 1), Op1( 0), Op2( 4), is32, trap_raz_wi },
>> + DBGBXVR(2),
>> + DBGBXVR(3),
>> + /* DBGOSDLRd */
>> + { CRn( 1), CRm( 3), Op1( 0), Op2( 4), is32, trap_raz_wi },
>> + DBGBXVR(4),
>> + DBGBXVR(5),
>> + /* DBGPRSRa */
>> + { CRn( 1), CRm( 5), Op1( 0), Op2( 4), is32, trap_raz_wi },
>> +
>> + DBGBXVR(6),
>> + DBGBXVR(7),
>> + DBGBXVR(8),
>> + DBGBXVR(9),
>> + DBGBXVR(10),
>> + DBGBXVR(11),
>> + DBGBXVR(12),
>> + DBGBXVR(13),
>> + DBGBXVR(14),
>> + DBGBXVR(15),
>> };
>>
>> /* Target specific emulation tables */
>> --
>> 1.7.12.4
>>
>Otherwise this looks ok,
>-Christoffer
--
zhichao.huang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
