On 03/12/2014 19:45, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2014-12-03 15:26+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>>
>>
>> On 03/12/2014 15:23, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> I think it is better just to replace the last line with:
>>>
>>> *(u64 *)(dest + XSAVE_HDR_OFFSET) = xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv
> 
> Yeah, or we can use this value for xstate_bv to save some copying too,
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 19e5e8f..ba2b7bd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -3137,7 +3137,7 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_debugregs(struct 
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  static void fill_xsave(u8 *dest, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>       struct xsave_struct *xsave = &vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.state->xsave;
> -     u64 xstate_bv = vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0 | XSTATE_FPSSE;
> +     u64 xstate_bv = xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv;

Also good.

>       u64 valid;
>  
>       /*
> 
>> Right, this matches
>>
>>         u64 xstate_bv = *(u64 *)(src + XSAVE_HDR_OFFSET);
>>      ...
>>         xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv = xstate_bv;
>>
>> in load_xsave.
> 
> Btw, we don't care about crashers from userspace?

We do, but they're taken care of by

                if (xstate_bv & ~kvm_supported_xcr0())
                        return -EINVAL;

in kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xsave.  kvm_supported_xcr0 is always a subset
of host_xcr0, hence:

>       /* Set XSTATE_BV and possibly XCOMP_BV.  */
>       xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv = xstate_bv;
> -     if (cpu_has_xsaves)
> +     if (cpu_has_xsaves) {
>               xsave->xsave_hdr.xcomp_bv = host_xcr0 | 
> XSTATE_COMPACTION_ENABLED;
> +             xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv &= xsave->xsave_hdr.xcomp_bv;

this is not zeroing any bit.  Thanks for thinking about it, though. :)

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to