The implementation of KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT is currently not doing what
userspace expects, namely making sure that a vcpu which may have been
turned off using PSCI is returned to its initial state, which would be
powered on if userspace does not set the KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF flag.
Implement the expected functionality and clarify the ABI.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@linaro.org>
---
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 3 ++-
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index 7610eaa..bb82a90 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
@@ -2455,7 +2455,8 @@ should be created before this ioctl is invoked.
Possible features:
- KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF: Starts the CPU in a power-off state.
- Depends on KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI.
+ Depends on KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI. If not set, the CPU will be powered on
+ and execute guest code when KVM_RUN is called.
- KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT: Starts the CPU in a 32bit mode.
Depends on KVM_CAP_ARM_EL1_32BIT (arm64 only).
- KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2: Emulate PSCI v0.2 for the CPU.
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
index b160bea..edc1964 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
@@ -663,6 +663,8 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu,
*/
if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF, vcpu->arch.features))
vcpu->arch.pause = true;
+ else
+ vcpu->arch.pause = false;
return 0;
}
--
2.1.2.330.g565301e.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
