On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 07:59:00PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Minor cleanup > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c > b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c > index 78e689b066f1..2922f8d127ff 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c > @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ long kvmppc_h_bulk_remove(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > unsigned long *args = &vcpu->arch.gpr[4]; > __be64 *hp, *hptes[4]; > unsigned long tlbrb[4]; > - long int i, j, k, n, found, indexes[4]; > + long int i, j, k, collected_hpte, found, indexes[4];
Hmmm... I don't find it more readable, because "collected_hpte" sounds like it contains a HPTE value. Also I don't like using a long name for something that is just a temporary value inside a function, and "n" is a suitable name for a temporary variable counting the number of things we have. I would prefer just adding a comment like this: - n = 0; + n = 0; /* # values collected in tlbrb[], indexes[] etc. */ Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
