On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:05:39 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 02:54:38PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:43:10 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:

> > > @@ -174,6 +174,37 @@ enum {
> > > 
> > >  static inline int vhost_has_feature(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, int bit)
> > >  {
> > > - return vq->acked_features & (1 << bit);
> > > + return vq->acked_features & (1ULL << bit);
> > 
> > Should this hunk go into patch 28?
> 
> Well, this is needed here since 1 << 32 is not legal C.
> 
> I can move it - this means patch 28 will have to move earlier
> in series though.

Yes, I think it makes sense to move patch 28 earlier.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to