On 2014/11/20 23:37, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 19:25 +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> The next code fragment "list_for_each_entry" is not depend on "minor". With 
>> this
>> patch, the free of "minor" in "list_for_each_entry" can be reduced, and 
>> there is
>> no functional change.
> 
> A reasonable micro-optimization, but I'm curious if you're actually
> seeing some measurable overhead from this.  It seems like we'd need to

Oh, I just found this by code review. It's good to put pure check first and
resource allocation later, if they are order independent. Isn't it?
I think it will not improve performance but only save a little code space
and looks feel better.

> have multiple devices, all within the same IOMMU group, all probed by
> vfio-pci at the same time to exercise the race condition.  Thanks,

I think vfio_create_group can not be invoked frequently. So, the performance of 
this function
is not a major consideration, we don't care slightly performance change.

> 
> Alex
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 13 ++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>> index f018d8d..737eb468 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>> @@ -225,22 +225,21 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct 
>> iommu_group *iommu_group)
>>
>>      mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
>>
>> -    minor = vfio_alloc_group_minor(group);
>> -    if (minor < 0) {
>> -            vfio_group_unlock_and_free(group);
>> -            return ERR_PTR(minor);
>> -    }
>> -
>>      /* Did we race creating this group? */
>>      list_for_each_entry(tmp, &vfio.group_list, vfio_next) {
>>              if (tmp->iommu_group == iommu_group) {
>>                      vfio_group_get(tmp);
>> -                    vfio_free_group_minor(minor);
>>                      vfio_group_unlock_and_free(group);
>>                      return tmp;
>>              }
>>      }
>>
>> +    minor = vfio_alloc_group_minor(group);
>> +    if (minor < 0) {
>> +            vfio_group_unlock_and_free(group);
>> +            return ERR_PTR(minor);
>> +    }
>> +
>>      dev = device_create(vfio.class, NULL,
>>                          MKDEV(MAJOR(vfio.group_devt), minor),
>>                          group, "%d", iommu_group_id(iommu_group));
>> --
>> 1.8.0
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to