Correction: the word “never” in the message is too harsh. Nonetheless, there is a regression bug. I encountered it with “wrfsbase” instruction.
Nadav
On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Nadav Amit <na...@cs.technion.ac.il> wrote:
> Commit d40a6898e5 mistakenly caused instructions which are not marked as
> EmulateOnUD to be emulated upon #UD exception. The commit caused the check of
> whether the instruction flags include EmulateOnUD to never be evaluated. As a
> result instructions whose emulation is broken may be emulated. This fix moves
> the evaluation of EmulateOnUD so it would be evaluated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <na...@cs.technion.ac.il>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 56657b0..37a83b2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -4394,6 +4394,9 @@ done_prefixes:
>
> ctxt->execute = opcode.u.execute;
>
> + if (!(ctxt->d & EmulateOnUD) && ctxt->ud)
> + return EMULATION_FAILED;
> +
> if (unlikely(ctxt->d &
>
> (NotImpl|EmulateOnUD|Stack|Op3264|Sse|Mmx|Intercept|CheckPerm))) {
> /*
> @@ -4406,9 +4409,6 @@ done_prefixes:
> if (ctxt->d & NotImpl)
> return EMULATION_FAILED;
>
> - if (!(ctxt->d & EmulateOnUD) && ctxt->ud)
> - return EMULATION_FAILED;
> -
> if (mode == X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64 && (ctxt->d & Stack))
> ctxt->op_bytes = 8;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
