Previously, nop instruction emulation on 64-bit caused RAX bits [63:32] to be
cleared. This test checks the behavior is correct and RAX is unmodified.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <na...@cs.technion.ac.il>
---
x86/emulator.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/x86/emulator.c b/x86/emulator.c
index f653127..bf8a873 100644
--- a/x86/emulator.c
+++ b/x86/emulator.c
@@ -845,6 +845,15 @@ static void test_smsw_reg(uint64_t *mem, uint8_t
*insn_page,
report("64-bit smsw reg", outregs.rax == cr0);
}
+static void test_nop(uint64_t *mem, uint8_t *insn_page,
+ uint8_t *alt_insn_page, void *insn_ram)
+{
+ inregs = (struct regs){ .rax = 0x1234567890abcdeful };
+ MK_INSN(nop, "nop\n\t");
+ trap_emulator(mem, alt_insn_page, &insn_nop);
+ report("nop", outregs.rax == inregs.rax);
+}
+
static void test_crosspage_mmio(volatile uint8_t *mem)
{
volatile uint16_t w, *pw;
@@ -1045,6 +1054,7 @@ int main()
test_mmx_movq_mf(mem, insn_page, alt_insn_page, insn_ram);
test_movabs(mem, insn_page, alt_insn_page, insn_ram);
test_smsw_reg(mem, insn_page, alt_insn_page, insn_ram);
+ test_nop(mem, insn_page, alt_insn_page, insn_ram);
test_crosspage_mmio(mem);
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
