> > On Jul 10, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> james wrote: >>> >>> 5. So the questions are: >>> a] How stable/robust is the scsi implementation under KVM? i.e. >>> are there known weaknesses here that moving to higher KVM versions >>> will address such that using FreeBSD 7 will be a viable option. >> >> It hasn't been tested much (if at all) with the FreeBSD 7 drivers. >> In fact, I don't think there's been much testing at all of FreeBSD >> as a guest in KVM. >> > > I've been running 2-3 production FreeBSD guests under KVM for about a > year now. I haven't yet upgraded to FreeBSD 7 though, so they are > running 6.2 and 6.3 STABLE. I'm also running FreeNAS which is > FreeBSD based in a guest. >
Now THAT sounds promising. I have tinkered with the FreeNAS stuff. In a VM how many disk devices (i.e. real HDs not image files) are you allocating to the VM? Are you getting past the 4 IDE limit by using SCSI? I am watching the new version of FreeNAS under FreeBSD 7 with the ZFS addition very closely. It seems to be my ideal solution. Cheers, James. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
