On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 22:23 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Jerone Young wrote:
> > New code recently added to the repository has made some modifications to
> > the kvm_update_debugger() function in qemu-kvm.c. Where as no longer to
> > just call kvm_guest_debug...Now there is a new fuction on_vcpu() that
> > places things in work queues and launches them.
> >
> > The problem is when kvm_invold_guest_debug() gets called, it segfaults
> > calling kvm_guest_debug().
>
> I bet this piece from [1] will solve it:
>
> Index: b/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
> +++ b/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static void kvm_main_loop_wait(CPUState
> exit(1);
> }
>
> -
> + cpu_single_env = env;
> flush_queued_work(env);
>
> if (vcpu_info[env->cpu_index].stop) {
>
>
> I didn't bother posting it separately as I (obviously wrongly) assumed
> this wouldn't trigger for the existing code.
Yeap that was it. Works fine now. Your going to want to send this patch
out.
>
> >
> > What exactly is the point of complicating this?
>
> The old code quickly live-locked when you invoked kvm_guest_debug while
> the target vcpu was still running. I suggested to stop the vcpu when
> invoking this (and other problematic) services, Avi preferred the
> on_vcpu aproach. And that, indeed, turned out to be cleaner and easier
> reusable.
ah I see.
>
> >
> > This code does segfault on x86 also. For now I have just placed the old
> > code back locally.
>
> I would be happy if you could give my patches a spin as well. I was
> using them for kernel debugging during this week, but I guess I'm still
> alone. :->
I would help, but I'm having a fun time debugging this week myself ;-)
I'll let you if/when I can help out though.
>
> Jan
>
> [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/17968
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
