On 23.06.2012 09:07, Harald Sitter wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Saturday, June 23, 2012 12:11:37 AM James wrote: >>> As for the general idea that MS Office interopability is a hard requirement >>> for an office suite, I personally don't buy it given that there are viable >>> alternatives available. Please note that I am by no means discounting the >>> reality of many people's work and academic requirements. >> Everyone who lives in my house from elementary school age up has this >> requirement. I think we should showcase KDE applications where they meet >> average user requirements, but I don't think we should do so when the don't. >> >> Firefox by default anyone? (how many people use rekonq as their primary >> browser?) > 2 non-devs + riddell ... see my request for rekonq pre-SRU testing > mail from earlier this month > > there is a quality concern as big as the mariana trench if next to no > one on the team actually uses a very important part of the software we > throw out there... also, doogfood? omnomnom -.-
ACK. Despite some claims in the last default browser debate QtWebkit still receives zero security support and that seems very unlikely to change at least for Qt 4. > FWIW, since firefox upstream does not want to integrate with the > plasma workspace, while the chromium upstream does, I do believe the > users would be better of with latter Yes, now that we moved to universe chromium is imho the best candidate. Felix -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
