Thanks for all the info
Phil. 
Sent from my iPhone

> On 28 Mar 2024, at 14:33, Jeff Scott via KRnet <krnet@list.krnet.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> FWIW, I was using a Prince 62"D x 66"P prop on the O-200 on my KR.  IMHO, I 
> thought it was about as perfect of a match as one could make.  Easy cruise at 
> 2550 rpm, but would turn up to 2750 if I wanted to run WOT.  The down side to 
> the Prince Props at the time was the lack of leading edge protection, so it 
> tended to pick up rock chips and was easily damaged if you flew in heavy 
> rain.  On the other hand, I also found it quite easy to fill and repair. 
>  
> It's difficult to compare one prop to the next, especially on a KR.  Every 
> prop manufacturer seems to caclulate their pitch differently, and every KR 
> has a different drag component.  I worked very hard at drag reduction on mine 
> over the years with some very good performance results that just weren't 
> there when I first started flying it.  Less drag = more speed and higher rpms.
>  
> YMMV,
>  
> -Jeff Scott
> Arkansas Ozarks
>  
>  
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 at 2:25 PM
> From: "Phillip Matheson via KRnet" <krnet@list.krnet.org>
> To: "KRnet" <krnet@list.krnet.org>
> Cc: "Phillip Matheson" <phillipmathe...@bigpond.com>
> Subject: Re: KRnet> prop size
> Thanks Larry 
> The reason I asked, I have had all sorts of low RPM issues. I used 
> Thompson 60 x 70 = static 2100 wot 2400
> Catto 60x 70 = 2300 and 2500 ( still the best prop) 
> APP 69x 68 using now 2300  and 2500 if I drop the nose 
> Any one have any better choices I would love to hear. But of course I can’t 
> keep buying props. 
> So now just putting time on the engine and finishing phase one testing time 
> Phil 
> Sent from my iPhone
>  
> On 28 Mar 2024, at 00:12, Larry Flesner via KRnet <krnet@list.krnet.org> 
> wrote:
>  
> 
>  
> 
> On 3/27/2024 12:03 AM, phillipmatheson--- via KRnet wrote:
> Hi Larry old friend, hope you are well. Good to hear your ex bird is going 
> well
> 
> Do you remember her prop size, and static RPM and also MAX RPM straight and 
> level please
> 
> Phil
> 
>  
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> 211LF carries a Sterba prop, 60X68.  I returned it early on to be re-pitched 
> as it seemed rpm was a bit low.  I couldn't tell any difference on return.  
> It's been a while but I recall wide open level flight gave 2800 rpm, static 
> around 2400.  Zach has made a few changes as well as engine work so he could 
> give more current info.
> 
> Larry Flesner
> 
> -- 
> KRnet mailing list
> KRnet@list.krnet.org
> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
> -- KRnet mailing list KRnet@list.krnet.org 
> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
> --
> KRnet mailing list
> KRnet@list.krnet.org
> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
-- 
KRnet mailing list
KRnet@list.krnet.org
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet

Reply via email to