Marc,
 we did the same. It looks like you have the same spring bar as we have. 
Original we want to go for a tail dragger but we installed the springbar on the 
aft side of the fwd spar. We have defntly not an issue that the plan drops with 
2 pob and no fuel on his tail. You can install the spring bar in two position. 
1 if you lay it flat on the ground the middle is wider than the side where the 
gear is on.
2 if you lay it to the ground and it is not flat, now the wheels whill be 
further away from the nose gear.


Whe installed the gear like position 2. 
I think for my plane it is not that right because we have a bit mor weight on 
the nose gear. So check this!
 Good luck with your decicion.


Stef

> Op 17-08-2022 21:36 schreef Marc Baca via KRnet <krnet@list.krnet.org>:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello All;
> 
> 
> I have an aluminum gear on my KR-2 (N13UG) in tail dragger configuration ... 
> and despite all the advice against making it tri-gear, ... I intend to simply 
> flip the mounts to the back of the forward spar, and mount the nose gear... 
> then install  hydraulic brakes while I'm in there.  If the plane tilts 
> backward with me in it.. I will consider installing rearward facing 
> extensions on the gear to put the wheels an inch or two back.
> 
> 
> Picture taken at Chino Gathering ... sitting next to Colin Hale's former 
> plane.  
> 
> 
> Marc Baca
> Chino, CA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 09:42:17 AM PDT, Mark Langford 
> <m...@n56ml.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sid Wood wrote:
> 
> ....the new airfoil developed for the KR-2S is about 1-inch thicker at
> the root section.  The extra thickness requires an extra tall spar at
> the center spar location; keep that in mind when bolting gear leg
> brackets to the center spar.
> 
> You may be referring to the AS5048 airfoil, rather than the AS5046
> airfoil, which was intentionally designed to leave the main spar at
> stock dimensions with respect to the main spar.
> 
> From the "new airfoil" website at
> http://www.krnet.org/as504x/templates.html
> 
> The AS5046 profile is a best fit for stock KR2S spars. If your spars are
> already built, you would want to use the AS5046 airfoil. It uses a stock
> aft spar and a slightly taller main spar, which could be heightened by
> laminating an extra .125" thick strip of spruce to the spar cap. The aft
> spar would also need to be moved up about an inch with relation to the
> fuselage due to differences in the RAF48 wing shape and the lower
> incidence that is optimal for the wing. Each airplane varies, and
> correct incidence will only be achieved using the level lines on the
> templates, rather than measuring up from the longerons. Several people
> have cut their aft spars out and raised them, and I'm told it's about a
> 3 hour job.
> 
> Adding an eighth of an inch of leftover spruce spar material to the top
> of the main spar is not a show stopper, by any means...
> 
> Mark Langford
> m...@n56ml.com <mailto:m...@n56ml.com>
> http://www.n56ml.com
> Huntsville, AL
> 
> 
> --
> KRnet mailing list
> KRnet@list.krnet.org <mailto:KRnet@list.krnet.org>
> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
> --
> KRnet mailing list
> KRnet@list.krnet.org
> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet



Steph and his dad are building the KR-2S see 
http://www.masttotaalconcept.nl/kr2 <http://www.masttotaalconcept.nl/kr2>

-- 
KRnet mailing list
KRnet@list.krnet.org
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet

Reply via email to