I have been intending to post about Props for some time now.  I decided on a 3 
blade Ground Adjustable 60" Whirlwind prop for my Panther 130HP engine.

It was mostly just for the WOW factor.  I understand that 2 blade are supposed 
to be faster.  However, several things have come to mind since I have been 
running this. (not flying yet)

We who used VW and Corvair on our KR planes, have been concerned about prop 
length for several reasons, tip speed and ground clearance, mostly.

So, with a 3 blade prop, you can keep the length down and run at higher RPM, 
where you get more power from the auto conversion engines.

However, I have discovered that there is another very good reason to use a prop 
like this and it is to be able to keep the idle low and still have the engine 
run smoothly.

Even though the UL Power recommends an idle of 800 rpm, I find that mine will 
idle smoothly at 680 rpm.  So why the disparity between what I am getting and 
what UL Power recommends.

I asked them and they responded that their testing was done with a 2 blade 68" 
prop and that with the shorter prop, they would expect that I could have a 
smooth idle at lower RPM.

So, I ask myself now, "Why did I never consider using a prop like this with my 
VW and Corvair engines?"

See taxi run at PantherBuilder.org

My Panther Building Documentation at PantherBuilder.org Web Site

Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC

-----Original Message-----

Hello all. 
I am looking for a prop for my Corvair engine. If anyone has one for sale 
please email me at flyk...@gmail.com and I will consider what you have. A 56x54 
would be just about perfect. 
Thanks

Mark Jones
“Wunderbird N771MJ”
www.flykr2s.com
flyk...@gmail.com


_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

Reply via email to