Thanks Sid, that's exactly what I needed to know.

Cheers,

Tony King

Sent from my iPhone

On 26/05/2012, at 9:55 AM, "smwood" <smw...@md.metrocast.net> wrote:

> Orientation does matter.  For a given same cross section of the same type 
> lumber, the horizontal layering in a beam is about 15 percent stronger 
> according to a Forest Service handbook that I read about 25 years ago when I 
> was contemplating the same construction on my KR-2 spars.
> The basic reason why is: Putting the layer lamination vertical will induce 
> shear stress in each piece of lumber when it is loaded ( pulling g's, hard 
> landings, turbulence, etc.).  That is in addition to the compression or 
> tension load that the spar pieces would be handling.   This tends to break 
> the grain along the length of the lumber.  The glue (epoxy) that you will be 
> using is much stronger than the resin bonds that the tree has put between 
> each individual wood fiber.  So, the horizontal layering can handle the 
> shear stress much better.
> And the thinner the layers for the same built-up cross section, the stronger 
> will be the finished product.  There is a limit regarding how much epoxy 
> gets added versus the volume of timber in order to keep the weight to 
> strength ratio in bounds.
> 
> Sid Wood
> Tri-gear KR-2 N6242
> Mechanicsville, MD, USA
> smw...@md.metrocast.net
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> I'm about to start laminating the timber to form my centre section
> spars from pieces that are 19mm (3/4") thick.  Is the orientation of
> the laminations significant?  I'm not sure why but all the laminated
> timber beams I've seen have the lamination layer horizontal.  I can do
> this but in this case I'd waste less wood if the laminations were
> vertical.  Does it matter?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tony King
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search. 
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html

Reply via email to