On 12/2/2011 9:32 AM, Glenn Martin wrote: > Not RG-58. Too lossy. Use RG-8X instead.
You say too lossy. At the frequencies we run at, what's the difference in attenuation?
On 12/2/2011 9:32 AM, Glenn Martin wrote: > Not RG-58. Too lossy. Use RG-8X instead.
You say too lossy. At the frequencies we run at, what's the difference in attenuation?