> Mark Langford wrote....
> I'll build my next engine with a max of 9:1 compression ratio, and that's > with > optimal quench volume. Sub-optimal quench volumes require an even lower > compression ratio, in my opinion. > So, Mark, are you saying that even with the EIS that you have, you'd go down to 9:1?? What if you had a less sophisticated monitering system... would you further reduce the c/r??? How much??
