While we are on this subject, there was guy building a radial, called RADCAM, that was small and used no connecting rods. Don't know what ever happened to it though???
Fred Johnson Reno, NV Craig wrote: I saw an engine years ago called the Dynacam that was a crazy neat idea that had great potential but you never hear about it now. Hope this one pans out because we need new technology's that can deliver on the promises. > This is no wimp engine. > It's a two cylinder with four pistons delivering 300+ Horse > Power > It's extremely small and very efficient and is presently in > use in test applications > The configuration below is equivalent to a extremely ballsy > four cylinder engine > When doubled, it's an extremely ballsy 600+ H.P. engine
