Dan Heath wrote, "Please let us know if you  are able to get ANYTHING out of 
RR.  They are a very sorry excuse for a business."

Also, "You actually will most likely get better performance out of the new 
wing, although it is more difficult to build.  I also think that the scratch 
built wings are lighter than the Diehl skins. "

Your tellin me they are!!!!
    My plan was to use the raf 48 wing skins, as I think with a good set of 
seals on the aerlerons, and the higher aspect ratio of the wing skins, then the 
performance of the two at about 100 knots will be pretty close, the newer 
section gives about a 10 per cent reduction in drag at this speed I believe, 
but this is drag of the wing, ( actually wing section ), and not the total drag 
of the aeroplane, so the difference as a function of total drag would be less 
then 10 per cent. It would probably cost half the cost of the wing skins in 
just foam at Sydney prices, then glass etc etc, so why bother, use the ready 
made part and the older wing section. There is someone here locally who makes 
wing skins, but they want there money, Dan Diehl does them for $2200 US, the 
local guy wants A$10,000, about US$13000.
    However, I went for a fly in a kr just recently, with the longer span of 
Gary Morgans kr's, and the newer section, and at 80 kts, 80 litres of fuel, two 
persons on board, and 80 hp, it was still climbing at 700 fpm, at top of climb 
it levelled out and went straight to 140 kts, all with three wheels hanging out 
in the breeze, the font one having no fairings on it. So, a lot to be said for 
the newer section, especially at the higher speeds.
    As RR is useless, and Dan Diehl is not interested anymore in wing skins, 
then maybe  its time someone else started kr manufacturing, or at least kr 
parts, surprisingly, kr's go together very very quickly, IF, you have things 
like control rods, fuel tanks, gear , hinges, and all you have to do is bolt 
them in, what takes time is INVENTING the wheel, working out HOW TO BUILD THE 
WHEEL, fitting the wheel in the airframe takes next to no times at all. To cut 
a long story short, more standardization of parts would probably help, plus 
other things but tired of typing so here endeth the lesson.


                                                                                
                                Chris Johnston
                                                                                
                                North Richmond
                                                                                
                                NSW Australia

Reply via email to