Robin, My canopy is approximately 3 inches higher than the standard so as to accept the Dragonfly canopy. I do not have a problem probably to the aerodynamic shape of the canopy. My KR has about 45 hours on it, finished it in February and it is the nicest flying aircraft that I have ever flown. Bill Page boliverp...@bellsouth.net
----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin Macdonald" <r.macdon...@clear.net.nz> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 12:56 AM Subject: KR> Height of Canopy. > Netheads, > > There was a question asked a few weeks ago but I have not seen a reply. > > What is the max height of the top of the canopy or top of turtle deck > without interfering with the airflow over the tail feathers > > What has been used as the datum, (botom of the fuselage) or (top of rear > spar). > > Or what height has anyone gone to. > > Thanks > > > Robin > > r.macdon...@clear.net.nz > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html >
