At 06:02 PM 6/9/2006, you wrote: >This could be a good idea, if there was evidence of a problem, which >there is NOT. Why is there an expectation that the WAF joint is a weak >point?
Why accept something that is less than it can be? If people were willing to belive that something can't be improved, then we would still be driving Ford Model "T"s. A designer has to try and find a better way to do whatever the job is. The KR wing attachment is not an optimal design. It was copied directly for another, older, design and no thought was given to making it better. Don Reid - donreid "at" peoplepc.com Bumpass, Va Visit my web sites at: AeroFoil, a 2-D Airfoil Design And Analysis Computer Program: http://aerofoilengineering.com KR2XL construction: http://aerofoilengineering.com/KR/KR2XL.htm Aviation Surplus: http://aerofoilengineering.com/PartsListing/Airparts.htm EAA Chapter 231: http://eaa231.org Ultralights: http://usua250.org VA EAA Regional Fly-in: http://vaeaa.org
