My company got the memo (small airline out of STL).  I don't know what to 
think about it right now, working for an airline, it seems to keep the flow 
of traffic going and the line down at the end of the runway.  It may save a 
little time or just seems to at least.

Years ago in STL there was a terrible accident involving a "taxi into 
position and hold" clearance issued to a Cheyenne.  At the time St. Louis 
Lambert had a small parallel runway which was originally a taxiway that they 
repainted.  The cheyenne accidentally taxied across the narrow runway and 
went into position on 30R at an intersection downfield.  At the same time an 
MD-80 was given a takeoff clearance on 30R at the end.  I'm not sure if it 
was morning or not, but the weather was down and the MD-80 did not see the 
cheyenne in time to stop and ripped the top off the cheyenne.  We get to see 
the pictures every year during recurrent training since we are based here in 
STL.  It looked like the top was literally chopped straight off by the 80's 
wing, kinda like sheriff Bueford T. Justice's car in smokey and the bandit.
I'm not to worried about it at the end of the runway, but when I cross a 
runway downfield of someone holding in position, I make sure I am lit up 
like the Griswald's house at christmass time.

Has the new policy taken effect yet?  If it has, STL is one of the "exempt" 
airports or just ignoring it.   I flew in this morning and heard several 
"position and holds" on the parallel.

I wonder if the bahamas will comply as well, I always liked their 
version...."line up and wait".



Reply via email to