Congratulations!!
> [Original Message] > From: <krnet-requ...@mylist.net> > To: <kr...@mylist.net> > Date: 3/26/2006 12:00:14 AM > Subject: KRnet Digest, Vol 348, Issue 140 > > Send KRnet mailing list submissions to > kr...@mylist.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mylist.net/listinfo/krnet > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > krnet-requ...@mylist.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > krnet-ow...@mylist.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of KRnet digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Spoilers? (Frank Ross) > 2. Re: cockpit noise (Frank Ross) > 3. Re: Sun and Fun (Frank Ross) > 4. Re: cockpit noise (D F Lively) > 5. Re: KR2s Wings (D F Lively) > 6. Re: Carburetor ???? (bo...@hatconversions.com) > 7. Re: Carburetor ???? (Bob Glidden) > 8. N357CJ is now an airplane (Joe H Horton) > 9. Re: N357CJ is now an airplane (jeffyor...@qx.net) > 10. Re: N357CJ is now an airplane (stee...@aol.com) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:26:44 -0800 (PST) > From: Frank Ross <alamo...@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: KR> Spoilers? > To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> > Message-ID: <20060325072644.62554.qm...@web32003.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Thanks Virg, > I'll "look it up" as they say. > BTW, sure will miss coming to SNF this year. Hope you all have a great time. > Frank Ross, > > > VIRGIL N SALISBURY <virg...@juno.com> wrote: > I think "DUMBO" used spoilers with the GAW airfoil. Check > newsletter 396 ?? of the newsletters. Get the CD of past newsletters, > Virg > > > Frank Ross, > EAA Chapter 35, > San Geronimo, TX > RAF Lakenheath, Suffolk, England, UK > Visit my photo album at: > http://photos.yahoo.com/alamokr2 > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:41:45 -0800 (PST) > From: Frank Ross <alamo...@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: KR> cockpit noise > To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> > Message-ID: <20060325074145.2262.qm...@web32005.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Phil, > There are a lot of issues with noise sources that can complicate your solution. Secondary vibration from the fuselage plywood and the plexiglass canopy and even the fiberglass turtle-deck can combine to make considerable noise. While you might not be able to address many of the causes, the use of soft, noise-cancelling foam covered with light-weight cloth might help a lot. Using the stiffer foams covered with thicker upholstery-type material might look prettier, but is less effective when it comes to deadening the sound that vibration causes in the cockpit. Also, you are faced with the problem of not adding too much weight or anything that might come loose and get tangled in the controls. > A lot of folk just think the noise is all part of the fun of flying. > Good luck, > Frank > > phil brookman <p...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > has anyone done anything to limit cockpit noise > my kr is realy quiet to peopole on the outside but in there i need it > quieter > at the moment i am thinking insultaion on the firewall > its only yhe lower notes that seem to get through - > my exhausts route under the plane > phil > > > Frank Ross, > EAA Chapter 35, > San Geronimo, TX > RAF Lakenheath, Suffolk, England, UK > Visit my photo album at: > http://photos.yahoo.com/alamokr2 > > --------------------------------- > Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:52:00 -0800 (PST) > From: Frank Ross <alamo...@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: KR> Sun and Fun > To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> > Message-ID: <20060325085200.7567.qm...@web32004.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Brian, > Have you tried Google maps? I looked at the map on SnFs web-site and it looks pretty busy, but Google doesn't look too bad. You can zoom in or move the cursor to move the map around to the area you want. When you zoom in, it will print only what is shown on the map. You might then be able to draw in what you want on your printed copy and scan it. > First, click on: > http://maps.google.com/ > When the map comes up, cut and paste this address in the Google map search block: > 4175 Medulla Rd, Lakeland, FL 33811 > Zoom in to the area you want to use or move the map using your left-click button on the mouse. > The SnF site has a good map at: > http://www.sun-n-fun.org/content/interior.asp?section=yearround&body=Maps > but it is pretty busy. Very thorough tho. > Beware of clicking on the map to make it bigger! You are about to download a 2.86 mega-byte Adobe version. Nice map if you've got a fast computer and internet connection, but if you don't you'll have time to go to lunch before it is done! > Hope you find something that works! > Frank > > > Brian Kraut <brian.kr...@engalt.com> wrote: > I need to mark up a Sun and Fun map with my camping location for the "KR BS > and Barbecue" nights. I can't find a clear map on the SNF web site that has > any kind of detail near the vintage aircraft camping area. Can anyone point > me to a good map that I can use? As soon as I find a good map and mark the > location I will post it somewhere online and let everyone know where it is. > > Brian Kraut > Engineering Alternatives, Inc. > www.engalt.com > > > --------------------------------- > New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 08:06:44 -0600 > From: D F Lively <riksh...@interl.net> > Subject: Re: KR> cockpit noise > To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> > Message-ID: <44254e74.9fd88...@interl.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Phil: > > This is just a thought and can be a "Black Art" kind of thing. Have you ever considered the fact that a simple change of exhaust stack length could fix the problem. Sometimes the noise can be positively reinforced if your pipes length are close to multiples of the natural resonating frequency of the the engine and a change of length away drom the engines natural wave length may dampen it. Contact someone that understands harmonics and maybe take some readings with a frequency meter if you can find one. > > Pick my brain from recollections out of Physics class. maybe something to look at but don't try it with out checking out the therory with someone that really knows acoustics. Remember the "Muscle Cars" of the 60's that had Tuned exhaust sytems to enhance performance. > > Don > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Frank Ross wrote: > > > Phil, > > There are a lot of issues with noise sources that can complicate your solution. Secondary vibration from the fuselage plywood and the plexiglass canopy and even the fiberglass turtle-deck can combine to make considerable noise. While you might not be able to address many of the causes, the use of soft, noise-cancelling foam covered with light-weight cloth might help a lot. Using the stiffer foams covered with thicker upholstery-type material might look prettier, but is less effective when it comes to deadening the sound that vibration causes in the cockpit. Also, you are faced with the problem of not adding too much weight or anything that might come loose and get tangled in the controls. > > A lot of folk just think the noise is all part of the fun of flying. > > Good luck, > > Frank > > > > phil brookman <p...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > > has anyone done anything to limit cockpit noise > > my kr is realy quiet to peopole on the outside but in there i need it > > quieter > > at the moment i am thinking insultaion on the firewall > > its only yhe lower notes that seem to get through - > > my exhausts route under the plane > > phil > > > > Frank Ross, > > EAA Chapter 35, > > San Geronimo, TX > > RAF Lakenheath, Suffolk, England, UK > > Visit my photo album at: > > http://photos.yahoo.com/alamokr2 > > > > --------------------------------- > > Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. > > _______________________________________ > > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 08:15:14 -0600 > From: D F Lively <riksh...@interl.net> > Subject: KR> Re: KR2s Wings > To: Mark Langford <n5...@hiwaay.net>, KRNET <kr...@mylist.net> > Message-ID: <44255072.335c3...@interl.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Mark: > > I have read on the KRnet that it has been done but all are short on > details of the repair part. I have not done much with fiber-glass so I > may be over blowing my concern about cuting into the glass tha was > applied in a particular fashion which would have its integrity changed > by the repair. If this were a car no problem but cars do not fall out > of the sky either. > > Don > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Mark Langford wrote: > > > I'm sure somebody (lots) have retrofitted wing tanks. If you'd take > > this thread to KRnet, you'd probably find one or more. > > Mark Langford, Harvest, AL > > see homebuilt airplane at http://www.N56ML.com > > email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: D F Lively > > To: Mark Langford > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:07 PM > > Subject: Re: KR2s Wings > > Mark: > > > > Yes the Fuel Tank would do that and I am considering that > > anyway but leery about opening up the bottom of the wing and > > then the integrity of the repair. Anyone ever done a > > reto-fit of tanks into the wing? Would like to get rid of > > most of the fuel in the cowl tank anyway. > > > > Don > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Mark Langford wrote: > > > > > I don't know. I didn't build mine per plans. Can you > > > not put in a stiffening rib inside? Wouldn't a fuel tank > > > accomplish that? > > > Mark Langford, Harvest, AL > > > see homebuilt airplane at http://www.N56ML.com > > > email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: D F Lively > > > To: Mark Langford > > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 9:14 PM > > > Subject: Re: KR2s Wings > > > Mark: > > > > > > They are but do not like sounds that I hear when > > > they flex. > > > > > > How difficult are the wings to redo? Would the > > > best way to go be to go down to the spars and > > > start over, ribs and all? I am considering > > > retro-fitting wing tanks anyway and that might > > > require that I redo that area anyway. > > > > > > Don > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Mark Langford wrote: > > > > > > > I don't know. Mine are carbon fiber and stiff > > > > as can be. I would think that they shouldn't > > > > be that way, but I'll bet yours are stiffer > > > > than fabric... > > > > Mark Langford, Harvest, AL > > > > see homebuilt airplane at http://www.N56ML.com > > > > email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: D F Lively > > > > To: Mark Langford > > > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 7:45 PM > > > > Subject: Re: KR2s Wings > > > > Mark: > > > > > > > > Still inspecting my project and > > > > observed an "Oil Canning" tendencey > > > > be rween the spars on the bottom of > > > > the inner (2) bays of the out-board > > > > wing section when pushed on, is this > > > > normal or should they be very rigid? > > > > > > > > Don > > > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > Mark Langford wrote: > > > > > > > > > They may be Diehl wing skins if > > > > > they have premolded tips, which > > > > > would mean that they are basically > > > > > 2S wings (that's where 2S wings > > > > > came from). The plane at the top > > > > > of http://www.krnet.org/ has Diehl > > > > > tips (this plane was build by Dan > > > > > Diehl). > > > > > Mark Langford, Harvest, AL > > > > > see homebuilt airplane at > > > > > http://www.N56ML.com > > > > > email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message > > > > > ----- > > > > > From: D F Lively > > > > > To: Mark Langford > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 23, > > > > > 2006 7:46 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: KR2s Wings > > > > > Mark: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot, I will > > > > > look! This to me was a > > > > > big deal because it > > > > > deviated from the -2 > > > > > plans and there is > > > > > absolutely no way of > > > > > telling how it was done > > > > > and since it has the > > > > > Pre-moldeed tips the tips > > > > > extend about 1/2 to 1 > > > > > inch beyond the trailing > > > > > edge which is what > > > > > attracted my attention > > > > > and then noticed that the > > > > > distance from the aleron > > > > > to the tip was way over > > > > > plan and that got me > > > > > wondering if I should > > > > > not go back to "as > > > > > designed" but I liked the > > > > > added wing area because > > > > > it gets the stall down to > > > > > the magic 51 mph at close > > > > > to 900# > > > > > > > > > > I did some preliminary > > > > > bend stress checking at > > > > > 900# and 1260# gross wts > > > > > on the center main spar > > > > > section and got in the > > > > > upper 400's psi anf the > > > > > lower 700's psi > > > > > respectively which is > > > > > well under the 1300 psi > > > > > limit I found for Spruce > > > > > Bending stress. Not done > > > > > with that though because > > > > > I do not do this often > > > > > and need to give it a > > > > > closer look to make sure > > > > > I have all the loading > > > > > covered. > > > > > > > > > > Don > > > > > -------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > Mark Langford wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > There are basically two > > > > > > differences in two > > > > > > wings. The 2 wing had > > > > > > aft WAFs > > > > > > (wing attach fittings) > > > > > > that were straight on > > > > > > the stub spar, > > > > > > connected to > > > > > > WAFs that were bent > > > > > > three degrees forward > > > > > > on the outer spar. > > > > > > This gave a > > > > > > certain amount of > > > > > > forward sweep to the > > > > > > trailing edge. The S > > > > > > uses aft WAFs > > > > > > that are ALL bent 3 > > > > > > degrees, which doubles > > > > > > the amount of sweep of > > > > > > the > > > > > > trailing edge, making > > > > > > the wing more tapered. > > > > > > They use the same spars > > > > > > (in > > > > > > the interest of not > > > > > > changing the wood kit) > > > > > > but graft on a hoaky > > > > > > 12" foam > > > > > > spar connected by > > > > > > wrapping it with > > > > > > fiberglass, and then > > > > > > add an 8" foam wing > > > > > > tip to the end of > > > > > > that. If you'll > > > > > > download the AS48/45 > > > > > > templates from > > > > > > http://www.krn > > > > > > t.org/as504x/templates.html > > > > > > you'll get a pretty > > > > > > good idea of > > > > > > what the spars look > > > > > > like at different > > > > > > distances from the > > > > > > aircraft centerline > > > > > > (station numbers). > > > > > > These are not stock > > > > > > airfoils, but like I > > > > > > said, may help > > > > > > clear things up a > > > > > > little. Note the > > > > > > phantomed spars at some > > > > > > locations, and > > > > > > the notes around them > > > > > > regarding foam or > > > > > > optional or whatever. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Langford, Harvest, > > > > > > AL > > > > > > see homebuilt airplane > > > > > > at http://www.N56ML.com > > > > > > > > > > > > email to N56ML "at" > > > > > > hiwaay.net > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > From: "D F Lively" > > > > > > <riksh...@interl.net> > > > > > > To: "Mark Langford" > > > > > > <n5...@hiwaay.net> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March > > > > > > 23, 2006 7:03 PM > > > > > > Subject: KR2s Wings > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I read a entry on > > > > > > KRnet from back in > > > > > > 11-03, I believe, RE > > > > > > Wing > > > > > > > construction > > > > > > differences between > > > > > > the -2 & -2s. To me > > > > > > it seemed to > > > > > > > indicate that there > > > > > > was nodiffernce in the > > > > > > spars and that the wing > > > > > > > > > > > > > extention were about > > > > > > 10-1/2 inches and foam > > > > > > construction.with an > > > > > > added > > > > > > > rib at the end maybe > > > > > > only a 3/32 plywood > > > > > > added to the outer face > > > > > > of the > > > > > > > spar to extend them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You seem knowledgable > > > > > > and experienced with > > > > > > the KR varient designs > > > > > > and > > > > > > > was wondering if you > > > > > > could make how the 2s > > > > > > outer wing is built > > > > > > more > > > > > > > clear. I need to > > > > > > know because this > > > > > > project I took over > > > > > > appears to have > > > > > > > 2s wings, anyway the > > > > > > Oa lengthof the outer > > > > > > wings is 94 to 95 inche > > > > > > which > > > > > > > gets me to a wing > > > > > > area of about 85 SF and > > > > > > gets me a theoretical > > > > > > stall of > > > > > > > 50.87 mph. Can you > > > > > > help me with how -2s > > > > > > wings are built? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 06:24:59 -0800 (PST) > From: bo...@hatconversions.com > Subject: Re: KR>Carburetor ???? > To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> > Message-ID: <46000.127.0.0.1.1143296699.squirrel@205.234.99.76> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > Eric, > The C-85 and the 0-200 I have here both have MA-3 carbs on them. I'll > get the part numbers off them....Paul has done some research and is > trying to find a MA-3 for his 163 inch Corvair. He has a friend that > is Mr. Gofast that crunched the numbers and said it should be ideal. > You can control the cfm with the throttle and the mixture with the > control. I'll get back to you with the numbers........Bobby > > > > > > > Trying to find out what size engine this carburetor came off of. It is a > > MA3PA P/N 10-2948 and if it would be ok for a corvair. Does anybody know? > > > > Eric Pitts > > Terre Haute IN > > KR2S > > http://home.att.net/~e.j.pitts/ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________ > > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:51:58 -0500 > From: "Bob Glidden" <glid...@ccrtc.com> > Subject: Re: KR>Carburetor ???? > To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> > Message-ID: <010e01c65024$0c8f4b00$6501a8c0@ADMINISTRATOR> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > The question really is not rather the MA-3SPA will work on the corvair,the > question is rather or not the MA-3PA will work... > > Bob Glidden > Eminence,Indiana > KR2S N181FW (building) > Corvair 110 > glid...@ccrtc.com > > --- > --- > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:55:21 -0500 > From: Joe H Horton <joe.kr2s.buil...@juno.com> > Subject: KR> N357CJ is now an airplane > To: corvaircr...@mylist.net,kr...@mylist.net > Message-ID: <20060325.115521.2840.1.joe.kr2s.buil...@juno.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Guys , > The deed is done and it feels like a relief although I know there > is more to do. But I landed this morning after a smooth and uneventful > flight of 1.1 hours and a total of 40.4 in the log book. I had to work at > it this week but managed to get in 6.4 hours and 10 landings. I explored > climbs, cruise, decents and stalls with full fuel and up to 50# extra in > the passenger seat. The plane and engine handled it beautifully to this > point and I will continue to check it further into the weight envelope. > All I can really say is that it is so exciting (almost orgasmic) This has > been a dream as long as I can remember. I know that I was trying to > design my own pedal powered helicopter and plane at about 9 years > old.(then someone explained friction and energy loss to me). When I was > about 10 I figured that everyone would own a flying car by 2000. It took > a long time to realize that not that many people really had the stuff to > fly. Six years latter than that target date I now own that dream. It's > very real and a lot of fun. I want to thank everyone that has helped me. > Some of you know that you helped and others may not know that they have > through their post or simply being a friend with a common goal. I look > forward to meeting all of you sometime and sharing more good times and > knowledge that comes from the incredibly rewarding hobby of home building > aircraft. > Thanks again > Joe Horton, Coopersburg, Pa. > joe.kr2s.buil...@juno.com > > PS. -- 1st trip is planned for one morning this week to visit my Dad. It > is a 3 1/2 hr drive but in the time machine I think 45 minutes from take > off to landing should do it. Breakfast for an hour and back to work by 9. > Man what a life. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:02:20 -0500 > From: <jeffyor...@qx.net> > Subject: Re: KR> N357CJ is now an airplane > To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> > Message-ID: <000701c65036$43ac01c0$6464a8c0@server> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > GREAT, COOL, GREAT, CONGRATULATIONS!! > > I too am working toward getting in the air, well I am working to get back in > the air. > > I finally got N839BG back together. I have been doing some taxi work and > practicing holding the nose wheel off the runway and generally getting back > to ground handling and so on. > > With all the changes/ upgrades/ fixes or what ever you want to call them, I > had a few minor squawks. One CHT not working, landing light inop Card > Compass still needs a little adjustment but over all it runs well. Of course > my mission at this point is to find these things and make sure I use the > taxi testing to work them out, as well as to get back to the feel of the KR. > Also want to burn off that old gas before it goes back in the air. > > I have been working all week at getting my bi annual done but the weather > and scheduling has not allowed me to complete that. > > Hopefully the weather today will cooperate and I can get in the much needed > air time. I have decided to rent a 172. Can not seem to find an instructor > willing to do this in my KR. Probably all the better as that would be a test > of the CG envelope, probably not smart. However, I have flown it with 2 > adults. Both of us where pretty lean. Me at about 170 and he was only about > 145. > > If all goes well, N839BG will be back in the air today or tomorrow, weather > and pilot proficiency permitting. > > Then get in as many landings and flying as possible and make it to Sun N > Fun. > > Jeff York > Lexington, KY. > KR-2 Flying almost again > N839BG > Home page http://web.qx.net/jeffyork40/ > My KR-2 http://web.qx.net/jeffyork40/Airplane/ to see my KR-2 > Email jeffyor...@qx.net > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joe H Horton" <joe.kr2s.buil...@juno.com> > To: <corvaircr...@mylist.net>; <kr...@mylist.net> > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 11:55 AM > Subject: KR> N357CJ is now an airplane > > > > Guys , > > The deed is done and it feels like a relief although I know there > > is more to do. But I landed this morning after a smooth and uneventful > > flight of 1.1 hours and a total of 40.4 in the log book. I had to work at > > it this week but managed to get in 6.4 hours and 10 landings. I explored > > climbs, cruise, decents and stalls with full fuel and up to 50# extra in > > the passenger seat. The plane and engine handled it beautifully to this > > point and I will continue to check it further into the weight envelope. > > All I can really say is that it is so exciting (almost orgasmic) This has > > been a dream as long as I can remember. I know that I was trying to > > design my own pedal powered helicopter and plane at about 9 years > > old.(then someone explained friction and energy loss to me). When I was > > about 10 I figured that everyone would own a flying car by 2000. It took > > a long time to realize that not that many people really had the stuff to > > fly. Six years latter than that target date I now own that dream. It's > > very real and a lot of fun. I want to thank everyone that has helped me. > > Some of you know that you helped and others may not know that they have > > through their post or simply being a friend with a common goal. I look > > forward to meeting all of you sometime and sharing more good times and > > knowledge that comes from the incredibly rewarding hobby of home building > > aircraft. > > Thanks again > > Joe Horton, Coopersburg, Pa. > > joe.kr2s.buil...@juno.com > > > > PS. -- 1st trip is planned for one morning this week to visit my Dad. It > > is a 3 1/2 hr drive but in the time machine I think 45 minutes from take > > off to landing should do it. Breakfast for an hour and back to work by 9. > > Man what a life. > > > > _______________________________________ > > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:53:22 EST > From: stee...@aol.com > Subject: Re: KR> N357CJ is now an airplane > To: kr...@mylist.net > Message-ID: <334.c7d3b5.3156e...@aol.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > JH "said the deed is done", soooo a hearty HiHo, aeroplano, or > the more familiar yeeeeeeeehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Joe. > Franc Steel, a Houston observer > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > See KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html > > End of KRnet Digest, Vol 348, Issue 140 > ***************************************
