I hear concerns about these two massive spacers. Maybe Dene Collett would 
know why they were made that way in the first place?

Serge Vidal









Guys, you don't know how good that discussion on weight makes me feel! 
Because, you see, last time I did a mass and balance on my KR2, it 
weighted 321 kg empty, and that is 707 lb. And I found that was definitely 

on the heavy side, and I was running short on easy ideas on how to make it 

lighter. Now, I will rather concentrate on convincing my airworthiness 
authorities on increasing the MTOW!

This being said, I still consider three relatively easy ways to save 
weight, namely:

1 - Carving the wings leading edge
It is made of solid expanded polystyrene, low density, and I suspect that 
if I rotate a large PVC pipe through it, I might be able to dig out maybe 
1 kg each side?.
Inconvenient: I have to make a jig to align the pipe.

2 - Making lightening holes in the engine spacers
My engine is offset forward by about 2 inches. This is done with very 
large pieces of solid aluminum (they are U-channels that are about 10mm 
thick!) (0.39"). I could drill plenty lightening holes in them, and maybe 
shed another kg?
Inconvenient: I have to remove the engine.

3 - Changing the alternator
Currently, it is a car type alternator, which looks very heavy, and could 
be replaced with, say, one from a motorized lawnmower. Another 1.5 kg?
Inconvenient: I will have to redo the pulleys and the bracket.


There is another option, favoured by my wife: put the pilot on a diet.
Inconvenients: This is going to put me in a very bad mood!

Serge Vidal
KR2 "Kilimanjaro Cloud"
Paris, France 
_______________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html


Reply via email to