People tend to forget that a propeller is an airfoil. Compared to an
aircraft, diameter and pitch would basically give you wing span and angle
of attack, right? Now, you still have to define the wing profile and wing
chord. This is more than enough to justify huge differences from one
propeller to the other, even if the basic definition (diameter and pitch)
is the same.
I just recovered my E-mail today after nearly one week of computer
failure. I owe a few guys an answer. Just be patient, please.
Serge Vidal
KR2 "Kilimanjaro Cloud"
Paris, France
<pe...@heroic.co.uk>
Envoyé par : krnet-boun...@mylist.net
14/12/2005 18:55
Veuillez répondre à KRnet
Remis le : 14/12/2005 18:55
Pour : <kr...@mylist.net>
cc : (ccc : Serge VIDAL/DNSA/SAGEM)
Objet : KR> Props
Hi, the size of a prop is given as 2 numbers diameter/pitch.
In terms of maximum speed, the pitch is the important number a one inch
pitch would give 2.84 mph, so a 49in pitch prop would give a max speed of
139 mph at 3000 revs and 64in pitch gives 181 mph at 3000 revs.
VWs are normally limited to around 3400revs( in UK by PFA edict ), so a
49in prop would give me a max of 138mph. this is regardless of how big the
prop is - that's the max speed. At this speed the blades angle of attack
becomes zero, so it cannot provide any more thrust. The only way I can get
to go any faster is by increasing revs.
So given that I want ground clearance, I am limited to say 60 inch diam.
Now if you imagine a prop that is about the same width as a tape measure,
it will obviously need less energy to turn it than big fat wide blades, so
the designer has to come up with a prop that will have:-
1 have a theoretical max speed somewhat higher than the required max
speed.
2 shovels sufficient air to overcome the aircraft drag at the required max
speed.
3 is not stalled at speed below the aircraft take off speed.
4 does not produce so much drag that the engine cannot produce full power
at take off speed.
I am puzzled why prop manufactures only give the diam/pitch figures for a
prop, when as explained above the prop width/cord is vitally important
when choosing a prop
I suspect that it is not that Senns & Sturba have different ways of
specing a prop, rather one makes fatter props.
Pete Diffey
St Albans, UK
_______________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
