Well....I didn't see any comments that are being
discussed here, but I did look at the Wynne oil pan,
and I will say this...I think it's design lends itself
to reusage more than a steel pan does. Those darn
factory oil pans always dimple at the bolt holes, and
ya gotta sit there with a ball peen hammer and a block
of wood and knock back all the dimples. Wynne's oil
pan is aluminum, which wouldn't do that. Seems to me
that it's a very good quality piece, and when I saw
the pic of him hand welding those darn things, I'd
have to say the price certainly is more than fair. 

I did see some old magnesium Otto pans for sale on
Ebay...they looked sweeeeet!!!  Just not a very deep
sump, and it seems they wouldn't lend themselves to
flying too well. 

Keep up the good work Mr. Wynne.........Your
dedication shows. 


Scott

--- Steve Glover <kr...@cox.net> wrote:

> Attached is a message William asked my to forward to
> the net...
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: william...@aol.com [mailto:william...@aol.com]
> 
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 9:07 AM
> To: kr...@cox.net
> Subject: Re: FW: CorvAircraft> oil pan
> 
> 
> Steve,
>  
> Please forward this to the list:
>  
>  
> Friends,
>  
> I was forwarded from this list Bob Unternaehrer's
> Comments about oil
> pans. Let me offer the following facts and spread
> some light on Bobs
> possible motivation.
>  
> Bob's comments about our oil pans are not based in
> reality. They are
> welded by myself in a very heavy jig made from an
> old case. They warp
> very little when welded. The holes in the pan are
> sized .290" . By
> simply running a 5/16" bit through every hole, the
> pan will drop right
> on virtually any case. This is about the size hole
> that GM used on their
> pans to make up for the manufacturing placement of
> the holes. Although
> most of the case machining is very accurate from the
> factory, the oil
> pan holes are not. I discovered this when carefully
> measuring many cases
> when developing our oil pan. 
>  
> What Bob say at the college was a number of builders
> installing pans by
> using a rat tailed file in the .290" holes to custom
> fit the pan to
> their cases. Kevin and I very rarely do this. When
> we build a motor we
> bore the holes to 5/16" and install the pan. They
> never leak. The
> college is about showing this to builders in person.
> If a builder wants
> to take a few minutes with a file, good, otherwise,
> drill.
>  
> As an additional thought, the way we stud the case
> to accept the pan
> makes the reworking the holes slightly more
> necessary. The stock oil pan
> is often used as a skid plate or a jack point in the
> car. of the 19
> studs on the case often 1 or 2 will lean a few
> degrees of vertical,
> something you would not notice on any pan installed
> with bolts. Bolts
> are less desirable, so the minor fiddling with the
> pan or drilling out
> of the holes is a small issue. The 100 or so people
> who have one of our
> pans on a running motor know this to be a non issue.
>  
> Bob's contention that the pan could not be reused is
> complete bull.
> Anyone who has read my website knows that I have
> reused the pan many
> times. At the college, three of the flying planes,
> My 601, Mark
> Langford's KR2S, and Steve Makish's KR2 all have one
> of my pans on them,
> that have been removed and replaced without leaking.
> In fact 7 of the 9
> planes at the college had one of our pans on them,
> as did all of the
> motors which ran on the dyno. Obviously they work.
>  
> The subject of using a Clarks pan was brought up.
> The weigh 6 to 9
> pounds more than ours depending on the model as our
> pan, they do not fit
> in any of the mounts I have designed and they cost
> about the same. All
> of these comments are in the manual, because of
> course I have flown and
> driven all of the pan styles. Many of these comments
> are also in the two
> pages of instructions which come with the pan. All
> of our products come
> with instructions which should be considered part of
> the build record of
> your engine. After the college I found Bob's
> instructions with his name
> on them discarded where he was working.
>  
> What motivates Bob, who has just come back from the
> college with a
> running motor, who bought one of our pans, installed
> it without leaks,
> and watched it run on our dyno to make comments
> about wanted to put on a
> cast pan, tell people the pan might not be reusable
> etc?
>  
> The answer is simple, In the history of 9 colleges,
> and countless Jr.
> colleges and night schools, Bob is the only person
> who has ever stood up
> and told people at the college coming "was a waste
> of his time". Yes,
> this is from a guy who was not charged for anything
> but parts and left
> with a running motor which my crew labored late into
> the night to fix
> such problems as Bob putting some of the rocker
> balls in upside down. In
> the end he left with his engine without even saying
> thank you to Kevin
> or I.
>  
> I had met Bob at numerous airshows before and
> generously describe him as
> cantankerous. I figured as a guest in my hangar he
> might be on better
> behavior. I was wrong. His abrasive style was
> apparent to many guests.
> When Bob complained about us not having an engine
> stand available the
> moment he needed it, one of the other guests
> unbolted their motor from
> one and gave it to Bob. This guy said to me quietly,
> "Lets get him done
> so he can leave". Bob was bad enough that I lost my
> temper with him on
> Saturday, and in some hash words told him that I
> didn't think he was
> acting like a guest in my hangar.
>  
> Yes, Bob spent about $800 in parts at the college,
> but he wanted to
> argue every dollar and ask for a price break on most
> of it. This is odd
> to me because he claimed to have spent more than
> $600 in Kansas for his
> valve job, which I thought was poor. We even took
> the time to weld up
> the nose on his junkyard starter to save him money
> rather than buy a new
> one from us off the shelf. Every word I have written
> about the colleges
> stresses education and progress in the company of
> friends. The joke of
> this is Bob doesn't even have an airplane for his
> engine that he was in
> such a rush to build. Although he was able to go
> home with a complete
> running engine, which he may regard as mission
> accomplished, I feel bad
> for him because I think he missed all the real
> benefits of coming to the
> college. 
>  
> Since Bob spends a lot of time on the net I think
> that it is important
> that readers have the full background before lending
> any credence to
> Bobs comments about my oil pans or anything else we
> do or make. You can
> pioneer the least expensive engine on the market,
> hold free events,
> provide the facility and expertise to build and run
> their motor for
> free, and 1% of the people like Bob will still go
> home, get on the net
> and tell people we don't know how to make or install
> an oil pan. It is
> part of business, its just not my favorite part. 
>  
> Thanks, William
>  
>  
> _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to
> krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at
> http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 





__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to