Hi Steve: Its really none of my business, but why would you use a 63
series airfoil when ther are airfoils out there that will give you 40%
more laminar flow to increase you top speed?
Sincerely
Jim
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:38:14 -0800 "Steve Glover" <kr...@cox.net> writes:
> Oh no, tell us it is not true.
> 
> You are not building one of erector set airplanes, are you?
> 
> Brian Kraut
> Engineering Alternatives, Inc.
> www.engalt.com 
> 
> 
> I'm afraid it is true...however I would never give in to the Dark 
> Side
> of the Erector sets! (sorry Dana) :)  The deal is done pending 
> final
> inspection when the buyer comes out from Boston.  I learned this 
> evening
> that the intention is, in fact, to take the KR to Boston at some 
> point
> but I will keep it until arrangements can be made for shipping or to 
> fly
> it back.  Too bad for me that I will still have access to it for 
> now. ;)
> 
> 
> My plan actually is to buy a flying Varieze until my LongEZ is
> completed.  I'll then sell the Vari to finance the new plane...a 
> highly
> modified KR-1.  Richard Shirley and I are collaborating on the new
> design and anticipate 240 - 275 MPH cruise.  I will document the
> construction process in case anyone is interested. The short list of 
> the
> design will be a 63 series airfoil, P-51 style electric retracts,
> stretched, widened, glass cockpit with auto pilot for the long trips 
> and
> possibly O2 if I install the turbo for high altitude travel. Stay 
> tuned.
> 
> 
> I'll most likely start on the new plane sometime this next year.  I 
> am
> hoping to have the L-EZ back in the air by spring or early summer so 
> I
> will be flying one of the EZ's to the Gathering.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Steve Glover
> KR-2 N902G
> AJO, Ca
> <kr...@cox.net>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 
> 

Reply via email to