Thank you Colin I printed your reply. Bill Starrs
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin Rainey" <brokerpilot9...@earthlink.net>
To: <kr...@mylist.net>
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:47 PM
Subject: KR> Testing and speeds, and weights


Thanks for the compliment Orma. I will try to measure up to the expectation, 
though I am only 5'5"....haha

On a more serious note, a 60 degree bank in a LEVEL coordinated turn results in 
a 2 g load on the aircraft, or basically doubles the 
aircraft weight through load increase, and increases the stall speed of the 
aircraft 40%.  This means that an aircraft that stalls 
at 55 mph will stall at 77 mph in a 60 degree level bank turn!  These are 
aviation constants that we CFI's teach pilots.  A level 
turn of 45 degrees bank exerts 1.5 g load.  Stalls while doing these maneuvers 
is referred to as accelerated maneuvering stalls due 
to the increased stall speed caused by the increased load during the maneuver.

Early in my KR testing I went out over the water just off the coast of Massey 
Ranch, home of William Wynne.  It is my designated 
test area and has a great view of the NASA Shuttle Assembly building and launch 
platforms. It also gives me a VERY long emergency 
runway called a beach!  Anyhow, I climbed up to 5,000' and began to get to know 
its behavior with gradual entry into both power on 
and power off stalls. They came on very gently, and I quickly began to have 
confidence that this airplane was going to fly very 
similar to the light twins that I enjoyed so much.  As part of your CFI ride a 
candidate must demonstrate a secondary stall.  Having 
taught several CFI students already, as well as remembering my own training, I 
began evaluating the KR for its behavior in a 
secondary stall.  My plane's reaction compared very much to the subjecting a 
horse to an electric cattle prod.  You might stay on, 
but it was gonna be a rough ride!   The most memorable portion was the violent 
drop of the nose, accompanied by a negative g or 2, 
(my flight bag went to the ceiling), and the hard roll to the left.  My next 
impression was that someone had snuck a NOS bottle on 
board, and had punched the button on that nitrous because the speed was now 
growing with tremendously rapid rate compared to other 
aircraft I had flown.  I leveled off and noted my altitude and realized that 
2000' had evaporated in what seemed to be less than 1 
minute.  This experience gave me a grave respect for getting this wonderful 
little bird too slow.

I have spoken before about how to plan your landings in winds by adding half 
the gust factor to your approach speed, which has 
allowed me to successfully land our KR in quartering crosswinds as high as 25 
knots (according to the E6B conversion chart 15 knots 
@ 90 degrees which compares well with a C172).
My reason for pointing out the change in stall speed during maneuvers, is they 
also change with weight change.  As you get heavier, 
your stall speed will increase.  When first beginning to look at KRs for 
purchase, I read the NTSB reports on Mark L's site.  A 
quick study of these reports found that virtually all the pilots who crashed 
their KRs were caused from getting too slow near the 
ground either on take off or landing.  This aligns well with overall accidents 
in general aviation, that 75% occur near airports 
during takeoff and landing phase.  From a statistical point of view, the cross 
controlled stall in the base to final turn has 
claimed more pilots than any other single maneuver, especially low timers.  I 
am not speculating on Steve's accident.  Merely 
relating it to the facts Mark Jones presented in his post.  AOPA Air Safety 
Foundation sent out a newsletter this past year with 
several articles about the hidden danger of the base to final turns and low 
altitude stalls.

My conclusions were that the KR is to be treated like a Mooney or Bonanza, and 
flown AWAY from the minimum speeds, and use things 
like flaps and speed brakes to help bleed off excess speed during round out and 
flare.  I have always been bothered by pilots who 
brag about how slow they can get their KRs.  First, all builder/pilots should 
know we don't have calibrated ASI's so no one knows 
for sure what speeds they are running. I keep hearing pilots compare to GPS, 
but that is GROUND SPEED not airspeed.  So BE CAUTIOUS 
and test your speeds for stalls, etc... at altitude to  find out where your 
stalls will occur solo, and then again with weight. You 
will find they do change.  All high performance aircraft are unforgiving slow 
and near the ground to mistakes, KRs included.

This one's for you Steve
The Southern Rebels are playing Amazing Grace....


Colin Rainey
brokerpilot9...@earthlink.net
KSFB
_______________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html 


Reply via email to